从卢卡契与布莱希特的论争看现代主义文学

发布时间：2018-02-01 15:43

本文关键词： 卢卡契布莱希特现代主义现实主义　出处：《广东社会科学》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：20世纪30年代,卢卡契与布莱希特关于现代主义文学有过一场激烈的论争。从表面看,卢卡契在这场论争中属于保守立场,而布莱希特则是竭力为新兴的现代主义文学辩护。这一对峙显然决定了卢卡契与布莱希特之争外在的优劣势分布:卢卡契是守势,而布莱希特是攻势。然则今天回顾这段论争,可以透过两人的论争深入地讨论现代主义文学的根本性问题。从更深的层面出发,卢卡契对现代主义文学的批判不能说都是守旧的美学观念,他的保守当中其实触及到了文学艺术的诸多实质性问题,因此,这场论争也就不是简单地能以保守和创新来界定划分的,他们之间的争论恰好为我们提供了审视现代主义文学乃至后现代主义文学的一个维度。
[Abstract]:In 1930s, there was a fierce debate between Lucacci and Brecht about modernist literature. On the surface, Lucacci was conservative in this debate. Brecht, on the other hand, is trying to defend the new modernist literature. This confrontation obviously determines the external distribution of advantages and disadvantages in the contention between Lucacci and Brecht: Lucacci is on the defensive. But Brecht is on the offensive. But if we look back at this debate today, we can discuss the fundamental problem of modernist literature in depth through the argument between the two men, and proceed from a deeper level. Lukacs criticism of modernist literature can not be said to be old-fashioned aesthetic concepts, his conservatism in fact touched on many substantive issues of literature and art, so. This controversy is not simply defined by conservatism and innovation, and their arguments provide a dimension for us to examine modernist literature and even postmodernist literature.
【作者单位】：南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：I109
【正文快照】： 自20世纪初现代主义文学在欧美文坛呈强劲之势起,人们便渐渐形成了一个大体固定的看法,即现代主义文学作为一个全新的文学思潮,实现了对19世纪传统现实主义文学思潮的超越。这种多少带有一点机械进步观念的看法似乎成了20世纪以来的主流观点。然而,撇开对一个文学思潮之根本特

【相似文献】