情节冲突背后隐藏的冲突:卡夫卡《判决》中的双重叙事运动

发布时间：2018-03-24 19:37

  本文选题：《判决》　切入点：隐藏的冲突　出处：《外国文学评论》2016年01期

【摘要】：卡夫卡的《判决》是世界名篇,也是最令人困惑难解的作品之一。一个世纪以来,它吸引了大量注意力,引发了激烈的批评争议。受长期批评传统的影响,中外学界仅仅关注了《判决》的情节冲突。倘若我们打破传统的束缚,把视野拓展到其情节背后的另一种叙事运动,就可看到一种不同性质的冲突。作品的意义在于这两种叙事运动的交互作用,在于这两种冲突的相互矛盾、相互制约和相互补充。如果能看到这一点,就能更好地理解《判决》在卡夫卡创作中的重要突破,更好地把握为何《判决》是理解西方现代派文学的一把关键钥匙。
[Abstract]:Kafka's judgment is one of the world's best and most puzzling pieces of work. It has attracted a lot of attention for a century and sparked fierce criticism and controversy, influenced by a long tradition of criticism. Chinese and foreign scholars only pay attention to the plot conflict of judgment. If we break the shackles of tradition and expand our horizons to another narrative movement behind the plot, You can see a conflict of a different nature. The meaning of the work lies in the interaction between the two narrative movements, in the contradiction between the two conflicts, in their mutual constraints and complementarities. It can better understand the important breakthrough of judgment in Kafka's creation, and better understand why judgment is the key to understand western modernist literature.
【作者单位】： 北京大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“短篇小说双重叙事运动研究”(15BWW002)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I521.074
，

本文编号：1659734