论《艰难时世》《功利主义》《论边沁》中共同的情感结构

发布时间：2018-04-23 15:13

  本文选题：狄更斯 + 穆勒　； 参考：《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：狄更斯和穆勒分别在《艰难时世》《功利主义》和《论边沁》三部著作中对边沁的功利主义学说做出回应。两人看似立场殊异,实则殊途同归。他们倡导个体权利、反对机械化的情感计算方式、坚持精神至上的价值判断,试图从对象、方法论和价值观三个层面对功利主义学说进行全面弥合,表现出了共同的情感结构。这种情感结构一定程度上代表着彼时文化界对边沁学说的接受和反拨,为深入探析功利主义哲学影响下的文化模式和意识结构提供了管中窥豹的一个片段。
[Abstract]:Dickens and Mueller respond to Bentham's utilitarian theory in his three works, "utilitarianism" and "on Bentham", respectively. The two men seem to have different positions, but in fact, they do so in the same way. They advocate individual rights, oppose mechanized emotional calculation, insist on the value judgment of spiritual supremacy, try to bridge utilitarianism theory from three aspects of object, methodology and value, and show common emotional structure. To a certain extent, this emotional structure represents the acceptance and backwash of Bentham's theory by the cultural circles at that time, and provides a segment for the further analysis of the cultural model and consciousness structure under the influence of utilitarian philosophy.
【作者单位】： 北京邮电大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I106
，

本文编号：1792494