论历史剧的拟历史性

发布时间：2018-05-08 07:03

  本文选题：历史剧 + 历史　； 参考：《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年04期

【摘要】：从历史剧与历史的关系看,拟历史性是历史剧的基本特征。历史剧的拟历史性指的是历史剧由一些有着历史意蕴的意向性的再现客体构成一种虚拟的历史。从已有的历史剧作品来看,其拟历史的类型主要有原型虚拟和非原型虚拟两种,原型虚拟又可分为吻合式原型虚拟和变异式原型虚拟。拟历史性表明历史剧不是历史本身,但却努力代表历史,并试图遮住历史,让观众相信它们就是历史,从而能够以历史的名义表现它想要表现的旨趣。大众普遍认可的历史剧的客观性和真实性取决于三个方面的因素,即剧作家是否对历史抱有高度敬畏的心态,作品中的人物和事件是否能表现丰富的意义,以及作品是否能让"历史"走进当代生活。在过去有关历史剧与历史关系的长期争议中,最大的缺憾是没有认识到历史剧中的"历史"是一种拟历史。
[Abstract]:From the relationship between historical drama and history, quasi-historicity is the basic feature of historical drama. The quasi-historicity of historical drama means that it is a kind of fictitious history which is composed of some objects with historical implication. From the point of view of the existing works of historical drama, the types of pseudo-history mainly include prototype virtual and non-prototype virtual, archetypal virtual can be divided into coincidence archetypal virtual and variant virtual prototype. Quasi historicity shows that historical drama is not history itself, but it tries to represent history, and tries to cover up history, so that the audience can believe that they are history, so that it can express its purport in the name of history. The objectivity and authenticity of the widely accepted historical drama depend on three factors: whether the playwright has a high degree of reverence for history, whether the characters and events in the works can show rich significance, And whether the work can let "history" into contemporary life. In the long controversy about the relationship between historical drama and history, the biggest drawback is the failure to realize that the history in historical play is a kind of pseudo history.
【作者单位】： 浙江师范大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I106
，

本文编号：1860430