《还乡》的原型解读
[Abstract]:Thomas Hardy is used to incorporating classical literature, Greek mythology, biblical allusions and his own experiences into tragedy. As a famous tragic novel, returning to Home is no exception. As Hardy selects characters, images and motifs with archetypal significance, and constructs the novel according to mythology, this thesis attempts to make archetypal interpretation of characters, images, motifs and narrative structures in the novel by using archetypal criticism theory. First of all, the tragic characters created by Hardy have archetypal significance. The tragic characters in the novel agree with the Greek mythology and the tragic images in the Bible in a certain sense. Like Christ and Oedipus, Kling is a scapegoat image of sacrifice. Yutsa was shaped like a Greek goddess, but under the control of a patriarchal society. Wheedy's archetype is Satan, because he stands for seduction and depravity. Mrs. Yeober took care of her son and niece, but ended up in tragedy. Hardy used archetypal imagery to strengthen the tragic color of the novel. Through the magical Eden wasteland, the darkness of night, the destructive fire and water, the author emphasizes that the society in which the tragic characters live is the symbol of oppression, depravity and death. In addition, some archetypal motifs are embedded in the narration of the novel, in which both the male and female protagonists intend to escape their living conditions and pursue a kind of inner paradise. After a series of painful ordeals, such as bereavement and death, they returned to a relatively calm and mature state. By analyzing the archetypal significance of characters, images and motifs in the novel, this paper intends to reveal Hardy's revelation and criticism of the backward oppressive social order. People are in the quandary of fate, fooling and powerless. Hardy embed repeated mythical characters, archetypal images and motifs in the tragedy novel to shape his tragic characters, construct the tragedy plot, and arouse the readers' psychological resonance and thinking about the tragedy. The opening work of Hardy's tragedy fully shows the author's tragic view of man and society and his strong desire for social improvement.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:I561.074
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄锦华;;《还乡》中神话词语比喻的使用和欣赏[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年03期
2 唐美华;;张谷若及其译本《还乡》文献研究述评[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年01期
3 黄荷;胡燕;;重审《还乡》中游苔莎的悲剧[J];文教资料;2009年15期
4 卓芹;;再探《还乡》女主角游苔莎悲剧命运的成因[J];考试周刊;2009年52期
5 马秀丽;;性格决定命运——浅析《还乡》中游苔莎的悲剧[J];作家;2009年06期
6 黄锦华;;神话词语和《还乡》的创作与欣赏[J];怀化学院学报;2007年11期
7 杨澜;;回归与走失:《还乡》中主人公命运分析[J];中州大学学报;2008年01期
8 赵炜;;想象的他者——浅析《还乡》中的尤苔莎[J];西安文理学院学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
9 叶冬琳;;空间焦虑下的艰难逃离——析《还乡》中游苔莎的反叛命运[J];牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年01期
10 李迎亚;;性别批评视阈下的《还乡》[J];文学教育(下);2013年07期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈琳;《还乡》的生态批评阐释[D];四川师范大学;2015年
2 吴超界;《还乡》中的浪漫主义怪诞与狂欢[D];南京师范大学;2014年
3 贾廷伟;《还乡》的原型解读[D];兰州大学;2016年
4 纪凡;从生态女性主义视角解读《还乡》中游苔莎的悲剧[D];辽宁大学;2011年
5 刘星娟;《还乡》中尤苔莎悲剧命运的生态批评解读[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
6 郭亚玲;《还乡》所用典故的艺术效果[D];河北师范大学;2003年
7 孙怡;哈代《还乡》和《德伯家的苔丝》景物描写中的反讽[D];广东外语外贸大学;2004年
8 章湘瑶;从生态批评视角解读《还乡》[D];浙江财经大学;2015年
9 李恩宁;论《还乡》中主要人物克林和游苔莎的存在主义特征[D];南京师范大学;2004年
10 刘莉;哈代《还乡》中乡村的自我维持[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
,本文编号:2127147
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2127147.html