幻听、灵听与偶听——试论叙事中三类不确定的听觉感知
发布时间：2019-03-14 16:03
【摘要】：叙事作品中的幻听、灵听和偶听源于听觉感知的不确定性,这三类不确定的"听"分别处在真实性、可能性与完整性的对立面上:幻听的不真实在于信息内容的虚假;灵听的不可能是由于信息交流的渠道过于离奇;偶听的不完整缘于信息的碎片化。就不确定的程度而言,幻听甚于灵听,而灵听又甚于偶听。感知的不确定必定造成表达的不确定,但迷离恍惚的听觉事件往往能使文本内涵变得更加摇曳多姿,带给读者更大的想象空间和更多的咀嚼意趣。不仅如此,这类不确定的"听"还能为故事的始发、展开和转向提供动力,对人物性格的凸显与作品题旨的彰明,亦有画龙点睛般的贡献。对幻听、灵听和偶听进行系统的梳理辨析,有助于更深刻地认识讲故事艺术的丰富与微妙。
[Abstract]:The three kinds of uncertain "hearing" in narrative works are on the opposite side of authenticity, possibility and integrity: the untruthfulness of phantom hearing lies in the falsity of the information content, and the untruthfulness of the phantom hearing lies in the falsity of the information content, which is the opposite of the authenticity, the possibility and the integrality. It is impossible to hear because the channel of information exchange is too strange; the incomplete hearing is due to the fragmentation of information. In terms of the degree of uncertainty, phantom hearing is better than spiritual hearing, and spiritual hearing is better than occasional hearing. The uncertainty of perception is bound to lead to the uncertainty of expression, but the confused auditory events can make the connotation of the text more swaying, and give the reader more imagination and more masticatory interest. Not only that, this kind of uncertain "listening" can also provide the motive force for the story to start, unfold and turn, to highlight the character and the theme of the work, but also to make an eye-catching contribution to the beginning, the development and the turn of the story. A systematic analysis of phantom hearing, spiritual hearing and casual hearing is helpful to more profound understanding of the richness and subtlety of storytelling art.
【作者单位】： 江西省哲学社会科学重点基地江西师范大学叙事学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“听觉叙事研究”阶段性成果(13AZW003);国家社会科学基金重大项目“中西叙事传统比较研究”阶段性成果(16ZDA195)
【分类号】：I106
，
本文编号：2440137
[Abstract]:The three kinds of uncertain "hearing" in narrative works are on the opposite side of authenticity, possibility and integrity: the untruthfulness of phantom hearing lies in the falsity of the information content, and the untruthfulness of the phantom hearing lies in the falsity of the information content, which is the opposite of the authenticity, the possibility and the integrality. It is impossible to hear because the channel of information exchange is too strange; the incomplete hearing is due to the fragmentation of information. In terms of the degree of uncertainty, phantom hearing is better than spiritual hearing, and spiritual hearing is better than occasional hearing. The uncertainty of perception is bound to lead to the uncertainty of expression, but the confused auditory events can make the connotation of the text more swaying, and give the reader more imagination and more masticatory interest. Not only that, this kind of uncertain "listening" can also provide the motive force for the story to start, unfold and turn, to highlight the character and the theme of the work, but also to make an eye-catching contribution to the beginning, the development and the turn of the story. A systematic analysis of phantom hearing, spiritual hearing and casual hearing is helpful to more profound understanding of the richness and subtlety of storytelling art.
【作者单位】： 江西省哲学社会科学重点基地江西师范大学叙事学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“听觉叙事研究”阶段性成果(13AZW003);国家社会科学基金重大项目“中西叙事传统比较研究”阶段性成果(16ZDA195)
【分类号】：I106
，
本文编号：2440137
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2440137.html
