《人民日报》《朝日新闻》对对方自然灾难报道比较分析
发布时间：2018-12-10 19:40
【摘要】：一般来讲,世界上各个国家对灾难的报道模式均有所不同。灾难性报道作为新闻的重要组成部分,与新闻报道一样直接在一定程度上反应了各国的政治态度、国际关系和外交走向的发展。灾难性报道的不同模式也是反应各国之间国际关系最好的晴雨表。所谓灾难性的新闻报道,是指新闻媒体对于各种灾难进行的报道。然而这些报道还分为"天灾"和"人祸"。自然性的灾难报道,因其发生毫无预兆性并常常伴随着一些比较严重的财产和人员损失并直接或间接造成比较严重的后果,所以常常是各家媒体和公众十分关注的焦点,也因此只要发生自然灾难性事件,各家媒体都会对其进行高频率的关注。本文在分析前人研究成果的基础上,以1972年中日建交以来,中国与日本在这44年时间内发生的所有重大自然灾难报道为例,两国不同的媒体分别从不同的角度,不同的方面,不同的报道立场,不同的报道用词和篇幅以及不同的报道风格,对对方发生的灾难表现出各自所代表的态度,进而探索中日之间外交关系在此阶段的不同发展走向,从而在更深层次上看出中H之间的政治关系变化。第一章绪论部分,就本文的选题背景做了详细的概述,并着重将研究内容和研究思路呈现在读者面前,使读者清晰明了的知晓研究建交以来中日之间对对方重大灾难报道对比的意义所在。第二章着重对比了中日媒体在进行自然灾难性报道时的差异,利用内容分析法,通过比较灾难发生时中日间不同的报道主是、报道版面、报道体裁、报道倾向、报道篇幅、报道视角、报道风格这几个方面,为下文深层次挖掘二者报道模式、报道理念的不同之处进行铺垫。第三章通过仔细分析中日间自然灾难性报道,对比所有有关自然灾难报道文章,深刻比较中日间新闻报道模式和报道理念的异同,从而为下文分析中日在建交44年来产生不同的报道模式和报道理念的原因埋下伏笔。第四章着重对中日媒体产生报道差异的原因进行分析。经过深刻分析之后,发现要根据不同的外交诉求、社会意识形态以及媒介性质来分析造成中日之间的不同报道模式的原因。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, different countries in the world of disaster reporting patterns are different. As an important part of news, disaster report, like news report, directly reflects the development of political attitude, international relations and diplomatic trend of various countries to a certain extent. Different patterns of catastrophic reporting are also the best barometer of international relations between countries. The so-called catastrophic news report, refers to the news media to each kind of disaster carries on the report. However, these reports are also classified as "natural disasters" and "man-made disasters." Natural disaster reports are often the focus of the media and the public because they occur without warning and are often accompanied by serious property and human losses, with more serious consequences, directly or indirectly, As a result, whenever a natural disaster occurs, the media will pay high-frequency attention to it. Based on the analysis of the previous research results, this paper takes all the major natural disasters reported by China and Japan in the period of 44 years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan in 1972 as an example. Different media of the two countries separately from different angles and different aspects. Different reporting positions, different reporting terms and space, and different reporting styles show their respective attitudes to the disasters that have occurred on the other side, and then explore the different development trends of diplomatic relations between China and Japan at this stage. In order to see in a deeper level between the political relationship between H changes. The first chapter introduces the background of this thesis, and presents the research contents and ideas in front of the readers. Let the reader understand clearly the significance of the comparison between China and Japan on the other side's major disaster reports since the establishment of diplomatic relations. The second chapter focuses on comparing the differences between Chinese and Japanese media in carrying out natural and disastrous reports. By using the content analysis method, by comparing the different reports between China and Japan at the time of the disaster, the main contents of the reports are, the layout, the genre, the tendency and the length of the reports. The angle of view and the style of the report pave the way for the following deep excavation of the reporting mode and the difference of the reporting idea. Chapter three compares the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese news reporting modes and concepts by carefully analyzing the natural disaster reports in China and comparing all the articles about natural disasters. Therefore, this paper lays a foundation for the analysis of the reasons for the different reporting models and reporting concepts since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan 44 years ago. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the reasons for the reporting differences between Chinese and Japanese media. After deep analysis, it is found that the reasons for the different reporting patterns between China and Japan should be analyzed according to different diplomatic demands, social ideology and media nature.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G212
本文编号：2371097
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, different countries in the world of disaster reporting patterns are different. As an important part of news, disaster report, like news report, directly reflects the development of political attitude, international relations and diplomatic trend of various countries to a certain extent. Different patterns of catastrophic reporting are also the best barometer of international relations between countries. The so-called catastrophic news report, refers to the news media to each kind of disaster carries on the report. However, these reports are also classified as "natural disasters" and "man-made disasters." Natural disaster reports are often the focus of the media and the public because they occur without warning and are often accompanied by serious property and human losses, with more serious consequences, directly or indirectly, As a result, whenever a natural disaster occurs, the media will pay high-frequency attention to it. Based on the analysis of the previous research results, this paper takes all the major natural disasters reported by China and Japan in the period of 44 years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan in 1972 as an example. Different media of the two countries separately from different angles and different aspects. Different reporting positions, different reporting terms and space, and different reporting styles show their respective attitudes to the disasters that have occurred on the other side, and then explore the different development trends of diplomatic relations between China and Japan at this stage. In order to see in a deeper level between the political relationship between H changes. The first chapter introduces the background of this thesis, and presents the research contents and ideas in front of the readers. Let the reader understand clearly the significance of the comparison between China and Japan on the other side's major disaster reports since the establishment of diplomatic relations. The second chapter focuses on comparing the differences between Chinese and Japanese media in carrying out natural and disastrous reports. By using the content analysis method, by comparing the different reports between China and Japan at the time of the disaster, the main contents of the reports are, the layout, the genre, the tendency and the length of the reports. The angle of view and the style of the report pave the way for the following deep excavation of the reporting mode and the difference of the reporting idea. Chapter three compares the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese news reporting modes and concepts by carefully analyzing the natural disaster reports in China and comparing all the articles about natural disasters. Therefore, this paper lays a foundation for the analysis of the reasons for the different reporting models and reporting concepts since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan 44 years ago. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the reasons for the reporting differences between Chinese and Japanese media. After deep analysis, it is found that the reasons for the different reporting patterns between China and Japan should be analyzed according to different diplomatic demands, social ideology and media nature.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G212
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 田雨霖;;日本媒体灾害性新闻报道的借鉴和启示[J];才智;2016年30期
2 李远;;中国灾难报道变迁分析[J];新闻研究导刊;2014年12期
3 王传军;;灾难性报道中的新闻伦理规范[J];山西财经大学学报;2014年S1期
4 杭月;;日本媒体灾难报道对中国媒体的启示[J];新闻传播;2014年02期
5 刘海涛;;中国灾难新闻报道理念的转变[J];中国传媒科技;2013年14期
6 班燕君;;灾难报道的分寸平衡与人文视角——日本《朝日新闻》地震报道的内容分析[J];东南传播;2013年06期
7 黄智知;;中日灾难报道的差异[J];新闻世界;2011年06期
8 董天策;章琴丽;;媒体定位与灾难新闻的报道视角——简析《人民日报》、《南方都市报》对日本大地震的报道[J];今传媒;2011年06期
9 涂晓华;;日本媒体地震报道及其启示——以日本阪神大震灾、新o_大地震为例[J];国际新闻界;2010年07期
10 董天策;蔡慧;于小雪;;当代中国灾难新闻报道模式的演变[J];新闻记者;2010年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 陈骁;《人民日报》灾难报道的历史演变研究[D];兰州大学;2016年
2 裴昱;中日报纸灾难新闻报道比较研究[D];山西大学;2013年
3 李明;灾难性新闻摄影伦理的研究[D];广西大学;2013年
4 宋滢;《人民日报》近十年灾难性新闻报道研究[D];新疆大学;2009年
，本文编号：2371097
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xinwenchuanbolunwen/2371097.html
