异性恋规范内外：《孤寂深渊》与《奥兰多》的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-03 08:43

本文选题：《孤寂深渊》　切入点：《奥兰多》　出处：《复旦大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪初,英国社会的主流性别观念仍受到维多利亚遗风的影响,认为女人是温柔软弱没有情欲的“家庭天使”,男人因拥有强壮的身体和理性的头脑而理应在政治、经济和社会生活中占主导地位。然而19世纪末20世纪初,第一次女权运动席卷英国,出现了“新女性”以及“轻佻女郎”,社会主流性别观念受到冲击。1928年出版的《孤寂深渊》(拉德克利夫·霍尔著)和《奥兰多》(弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫著)正是当时社会中复杂的性别观念的写照。两本小说问世后,已有众多学者从文本、社会环境、性别理论等多种角度进行了阐释,但将两本小说并置研究的例子较少。因此,本文拟以朱迪丝·巴特勒的性别述行理论为视角,将两本小说进行对比研究,探讨两本小说对于身体性别、社会性别以及性相三者之间的关系所作出的不同解答。本文认为,《孤寂深渊》虽然塑造了20世纪英国社会第一个公开的女性性倒错者形象,却因为不假思索地运用当时的性学理论,而深困在异性恋社会规范中,没有为性倒错者或其他性边缘化者带来出路；而《奥兰多》,以主人公变性、变装等荒诞的情节,错置了身体性别、社会性别和性相,挑战了异性恋规范所笃定的三者之间一一对应的关系,建立了一个没有性别意识的自由个体的乌托邦,为同性恋者、性倒错者及其他性边缘化者的自我定位提供了积极的启示。本论文将为解读这两本小说提供新的理论视角,从身体性别、社会性别、性相这三个维度去解析身份政治,并思考文本中所体现的异性恋规范的管制力量。
[Abstract]:In early 20th century, the mainstream gender concept in British society was still influenced by the Victorian vestige that women were gentle, weak, and sensual "family angels" and that men were supposed to be in politics because they had strong bodies and rational minds. Economic and social life dominated. However, in late 19th century and early 20th century, the first feminist movement swept across Britain. "New Women" and "frivolous Girls," the gender mainstream came under attack. "the Abyss" (by Radcliffe Hall) and "Orlando" (by Virginia Woolf) were published in 1928. The portrayal of the complex concept of gender. After the two novels came out, There have been many scholars who have interpreted it from a variety of perspectives, such as text, social environment, gender theory, etc., but there are few examples of juxtaposition of the two novels. Therefore, this paper intends to take Judith Butler's theory of gender narration as the perspective. A comparative study of the two novels was carried out to explore the sex of the body in the two novels. Different answers to the relationship between gender and Sex. This paper argues that although the Abyss of solitude has shaped the first public image of female transgressors in British society in 20th century, However, because of the use of the sexual theory of the time without thinking, he was deeply trapped in the heterosexual social norms and did not bring a way out for the wrong sex or other sex-marginalized people; and Orlando, in the absurd circumstances of the protagonist's transgender and cross-dressing, Misplacing body sex, social gender and sex, challenging the one-to-one relationship between heterosexual norms, creating a free individual utopia with no gender awareness for homosexuals. This paper will provide a new theoretical perspective for the interpretation of the two novels and analyze identity politics from the three dimensions of body sex, social gender and sex phase. And thinking about the heterosexual regulatory power embodied in the text.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I561.074

【参考文献】