探讨与重申经典的规范性意义

发布时间：2018-04-08 14:45

本文选题：经典　切入点：规范性　出处：《复旦大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：摘要：近世以来,经典的规范性受到广泛诘难,其背后折射了现代社会的根本问题——在变动不居的历史性中,是否仍然可能存在永恒不变的规范性?笔者将困境的远源上溯到启蒙运动时期,理性的祛魅导致历史意识的觉醒,进而形成了二十世纪以来大行其道的价值相对主义。笔者将经典受到的诘难在中西语境中进行分别考察,并相应列举了一些势孤力薄的捍卫之声。为了重申经典,笔者在伽达默尔的哲学诠释学视野下对此困境进行了反思,通过揭示启蒙运动的前见,为传统进行正名。经典作为传统的一部分,是一切理解与自我理解得以可能的条件,因此具有规范性意义,另一厢,经典作为一种历史存在,却不断克服时间距离仿佛在对我们直接说话,体现了一种无时间性,这种无时间性并不是超历史的价值,而是历史存在的一种特殊方式。最后,重申经典规范性对于当代中国的意义。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: in modern times, classical norms have been widely heckled, which reflects the fundamental problem of modern society.The author goes back to the Enlightenment period, the disenchantment of reason leads to the awakening of historical consciousness, and then forms the value relativism which has been popular since the 20th century.The author examines the criticism in Chinese and Western context and lists some isolated voices of defense.In order to restate the classics, the author reflects on this dilemma from the perspective of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and corrects the tradition by revealing the previous views of the Enlightenment Movement.The classics, as part of tradition, are the conditions for all understanding and self-understanding to be possible, and thus have normative significance. In the other compartment, the classics, as a historical being, continue to overcome time and distance as if they were speaking directly to us.It embodies a kind of timelessness, which is not the value of history, but a special way of historical existence.Finally, the significance of classical norms to contemporary China is reiterated.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I106

【参考文献】