当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

法的意识形态性研究

发布时间:2018-01-15 09:53

  本文关键词:法的意识形态性研究 出处:《南京大学》2012年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 意识形态 研究


【摘要】:以经济全球化为主要内容的全球化是当今世界客观存在的现实和发展趋势,而经济全球化则推动了法律全球化的进程。刚刚开始社会主义法治国家建设之路的中国,面对全球化的背景,遭遇到很多重大的理论和实践方面的难题。最为突出的莫过于在建设法治国家的道路上如何坚持社会主义方向,如何在与世界其他国家的法律互动交流中不失意识形态底限的问题等等。而这一系列问题的提出,都需要马克思主义法哲学予以回答和解释。 “法的意识形态性”是马克思主义法哲学的一个重要概念和原理,它承载的独特理论视角对于科学认识和回答中国社会主义法治建设中的许多重大理论问题和现实问题,具有重要的意义。 在马克思主义看来,任何社会的法都具有意识形态性。法离不开意识形态,意识形态在法中具有重要的地位和影响。无论是在法的制定过程中,还是在司法、守法环节上,意识形态对法的影响都是不可避免的。在阶级社会,意识形态都具有鲜明的阶级性,因此不同社会制度的法,其意识形态性的内涵有着本质的区别,它的具体表现是复杂多样的。因此,坚持运用法的意识形态性这一理论工具分析当下两大法律制度的本质,必须要认清两大法律制度体现的是不同阶级和集团的意志、维护不同阶级或集团的利益这一实质。 以法的意识形态性为分析视角,建设社会主义法治国家必须把坚持社会主义意识形态的指导与建设法治国家有机统一起来,正确对待和认识社会主义法的意识形态性,正确处理中国共产党的领导与社会主义法治建设的关系,发挥社会主义意识形态主流价值观对我国法治建设的引领作用,积极探索社会主义意识形态对法的运行发生指导作用的科学路径,既要避免泛意识形态化,又要防止国际国内的非意识形态化思潮对我国法治建设的侵蚀和影响,努力使意识形态和法治之间保持必要的张力。 在全球化背景下,基于市场统一规则和全球性问题的治理,虽然需要各国法律的通力协作和合作,但在法律全球化过程中以输出美国法律为主要内容的全球规则的制定,却是建立在维护美国本国的根本利益这一基本目标和底限上的。因此必须识破法律全球化的意识形态陷阱,积极面对和回应法律全球化的挑战,抓住机遇,加快我国社会主义法治建设的进程,使我国法治建设始终沿着社会主义的正确方向前行。
[Abstract]:Globalization with economic globalization as the main content is the reality and development trend of the world. However, economic globalization has promoted the process of legal globalization. China, which has just begun the road of building a socialist country ruled by law, faces the background of globalization. Encountered many major theoretical and practical difficulties. The most prominent is how to adhere to the socialist direction on the road of building a country ruled by law. How to communicate with other countries in the legal interaction without losing the ideological threshold and so on, and this series of questions need to be answered and explained by Marxist philosophy of law. "ideology of law" is an important concept and principle of Marxist philosophy of law. The unique theoretical perspective it carries is of great significance for the scientific understanding and answer of many important theoretical and practical problems in the construction of socialist rule of law in China. In the view of Marxism, the law of any society is ideological. Law is inseparable from ideology, ideology has an important position and influence in the law. In law-abiding links, the influence of ideology on law is inevitable. In class society, ideology has a distinct class nature, so the law of different social systems. Its ideological connotation has the essential difference, its concrete performance is complex and diverse. Therefore, insist on the use of the ideological nature of the law as a theoretical tool to analyze the nature of the current two legal systems. It is necessary to recognize that the two legal systems embody the will of different classes and groups and safeguard the essence of the interests of different classes or groups. From the perspective of the ideology of law, it is necessary to combine the guidance of adhering to socialist ideology with the construction of a country ruled by law in order to build a socialist country ruled by law. We should correctly treat and understand the ideological nature of socialist law and correctly handle the relationship between the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the construction of socialist rule of law. We should give full play to the leading role of the mainstream values of socialist ideology in the construction of the rule of law in our country and actively explore the scientific path of guiding the operation of the law by socialist ideology so as to avoid pan-ideology. At the same time, it is necessary to prevent the erosion and influence of the non-ideological trend of thought at home and abroad on the construction of the rule of law in our country, and try to keep the necessary tension between ideology and the rule of law. In the context of globalization, governance based on the uniform rules of the market and global issues, although it requires the full collaboration and cooperation of national laws. However, in the process of legal globalization, the main content of the export of American law is the formulation of global rules. Therefore, we must see through the ideological trap of legal globalization, actively face and respond to the challenges of legal globalization, and seize the opportunity. Speeding up the construction of socialist rule of law in our country, making the construction of rule of law in our country always follow the correct direction of socialism.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D920.0

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄辉;;缺失与建构:法律意识形态主体性反思[J];比较法研究;2010年02期

2 黄辉;;方法论的转向:法律意识形态批判的可能与生成[J];比较法研究;2011年06期

3 侯惠勤;试论马克思主义的意识形态功能与价值[J];常熟高专学报;2003年03期

4 王兆国;;关于《中华人民共和国物权法(草案)》的说明——2007年3月8日在第十届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上[J];中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报;2007年03期

5 孙国华,杨思斌;马克思主义关于法的本质的基本原理必须坚持[J];党政干部学刊;2003年04期

6 吕明;;法律意识形态的变迁——以我国民事诉讼中的“调解”为样本[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年05期

7 米健;从人的本质看法的本质——马克思主义法观念的原本认识[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1997年01期

8 李双元,李赞;全球化进程中的法律发展理论评析——“法律全球化”和“法律趋同化”理论的比较[J];法商研究;2005年05期

9 郝铁川;论现代法本质的另一面[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1998年04期

10 卓泽渊;;法律全球化解析[J];法学家;2004年02期



本文编号:1427815

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1427815.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e0c3f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com