权利冲突化解路径的经济法律分析——兼与苏力等教授商榷

发布时间：2018-02-09 04:31

  本文关键词： 权利冲突 冲突化解 权利位阶 权利平等 权利限制　出处：《法学》2016年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：权利位阶及优先权理论以权利的本质之"利益说"为逻辑起点,将尚未法定化的"利益"混同于"法定权利",基于"特定利益优先性"及"利益位阶论"得出权利位阶及其优先性之存在。这不仅漠视法定权利与道德权利之显著差异,还极易夸大权利冲突的客观性,弱化立法者清晰划定权利界限时的主观能动性。事实上,法定权利不仅是平等的而且具有明确的界限,该界限虽是相对的,但权利总是具体的,相对清晰的权利界限总是存在的。因此,对权利的清晰界定及其法律限制,才是化解权利冲突的理想路径。
[Abstract]:The order of rights and the theory of priority take the "interest theory" of the essence of rights as the logical starting point. The "interest", which has not yet been legalized, is confused with "legal right", and the existence of the right order and its priority is obtained based on "specific interest priority" and "interest rank theory", which not only ignores the significant difference between legal right and moral right. It is also easy to exaggerate the objectivity of the conflict of rights and weaken the subjective initiative when the legislator clearly delimits the limits of the rights. In fact, the legal rights are not only equal but also have clear boundaries, which are relative, but the rights are always specific. Therefore, the clear definition of the right and its legal limitation are the ideal ways to resolve the conflict of rights.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：中南财经政法大学第九届博士后科研项目“竞业限制制度研究——以权利冲突及其化解为视角”基金资助
【分类号】：D90-052
，

本文编号：1497080