布莱克司法社会学理论探析

发布时间：2018-02-16 18:05

本文关键词： 布莱克法律社会学司法社会学理论案件社会结构　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要是对唐纳德·布莱克司法社会学理论的解读和分析，，司法社会学理论是布莱克纯粹法社会学思想在司法实践中的具体运用和发展。他为法律社会学研究开辟了一个全新的视域，使人耳目一新。目前学界对布莱克纯粹法社会学思想的研究已取得了很丰硕的成果。本文拟在目前学界对纯粹法社会学思想已有的研究成果基础上，对布莱克的司法社会学理论做一个较为详尽而全面的分析。这不仅可以让我们更为深刻的理解布莱克纯粹法社会学思想的精髓，也能让我们更为清晰地看到布莱克所构建的司法社会学理论体系和良苦用心即为司法理论和实践提供一个全新的思维框架。在对布莱克司法社会学理论进行分析的基础上，我们可以发现一个分析和研究法律的全新的视域，从中也可以看到在司法实践中有太多的社会性因素影响和干扰了司法的运作和判决的结果。司法社会学理论主要是围绕案件的社会结构来进行分析的，即案件在社会场域中的位置和方向。在司法实践中，影响案件处理结果的社会性因素实在太多，那么如何消减这些社会性因素对司法裁判的负面影响自然成为司法社会学理论关注的焦点。司法社会学理论认为，法律是具有相对性的，随着案件的社会结构的不同而呈现出差异。只有在案件的社会结构大致相同的情况下，法律上相同案件相同处理，类似案件类似处理的结论才能成立。在布莱克教授看来，传统意义上对法律的研究有两个维度即实体的维度和程序的维度，而他的司法社会学理论则是理解现代社会法律的第三维度即法律社会学的维度，从社会中去理解法律，离开社会，法律将是不可理解的。本文共分为五个部分：第一部分：引言部分系统论述了论文选题的理由和研究的意义、国内外研究动态、主要研究内容及研究方法等内容；第二部分：阐述了布莱克司法社会学理论的产生与发展，以期从理论上梳理布莱克司法社会学理论的思想脉络；第三部分：是本文的重点，全面分析布莱克的司法社会学理论。主要分析以下两个方面:对作为科学的法律行为理论的分析；对案件社会结构决定的司法社会学理论进行的微观分析；第四部分：提出消减社会结构因素对司法运作负面影响的具体对策，需要从三个方面采取措施：法律合作主义；司法的非社会化；社会的非法律化；第五部分：是对布莱克司法社会学理论的评价，主要分析了布莱克在理论上的贡献以及其司法社会学理论存在的局限性和遭遇的理想和现实的双重困境；结语部分是对布莱克司法社会学理论的总结和反思。本文的研究主要采用文本精读和比较研究相结合的方法，同时借助国内外相关学者的研究成果。
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly about the interpretation and analysis of Donald Black's theory of sociology of justice. The theory of judicial sociology is the concrete application and development of Black's thought of pure sociology of law in judicial practice. At present, great achievements have been made in the study of Black's theory of pure sociology of law. This paper intends to build on the existing research results of the theory of pure sociology of law. To make a detailed and comprehensive analysis of Blake's theory of judicial sociology, which not only makes us understand more deeply the essence of Black's pure sociology of law, It can also make us see more clearly the theoretical system and good intentions of the sociology of justice constructed by Blake, that is, to provide a new thinking framework for the theory and practice of judicature. On the basis of the analysis of Black's theory of sociology of justice, We can find a new field of view to analyze and study the law, from which we can see that there are too many social factors that influence and interfere with the judicial operation and the result of judgment in the judicial practice. The theory of judicial sociology mainly focuses on the social structure of the case, that is, the position and direction of the case in the social field. In judicial practice, there are too many social factors affecting the outcome of the case handling. So, how to reduce the negative influence of these social factors on judicial decision has naturally become the focus of attention in the theory of judicial sociology. According to the theory of judicial sociology, the law is relative. Only when the social structure of the case is roughly the same, the legal case is treated the same, and the similar case is treated in the same way can the conclusion be established. In Professor Black's view, In the traditional sense, there are two dimensions in the study of law, namely, the dimension of substance and the dimension of procedure, while his theory of judicial sociology is to understand the third dimension of modern social law, that is, the dimension of sociology of law, and to understand law from the society. Without society, the law will be incomprehensible. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part: the introduction systematically discusses the reasons and significance of the research, the research trends at home and abroad, the main research content and research methods. The second part: expound the emergence and development of Black's theory of judicial sociology, in order to sort out the thought of Black's theory of sociology of justice theoretically, the third part: is the focal point of this article, A comprehensive analysis of Black's theory of judicial sociology. This paper mainly analyzes the following two aspects: the analysis of the theory of legal behavior as a science, the micro-analysis of the theory of judicial sociology, which determines the social structure of cases; Part 4th: put forward the concrete countermeasures to reduce the negative influence of social structure factors on judicial operation, need to take measures from three aspects: legal cooperation doctrine, judicial non-socialization, social non-legalization; Part 5th: it is the evaluation of Black's theory of judicial sociology. It mainly analyzes Black's contribution in theory and the limitation of his theory of judicial sociology and the dual dilemma of ideal and reality. The conclusion part is the summary and reflection of Black's theory of judicial sociology. The research of this paper mainly adopts the method of text intensive reading and comparative study, at the same time, with the help of the research results of domestic and foreign scholars.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-052

【参考文献】