阿列克西理性论辩理论研究

发布时间：2018-02-24 18:26

本文关键词： 法律论证理性论辩理论内部证成外部证成　出处：《燕山大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：罗伯特·阿列克西是当代德国著名法哲学大家，其代表著作《法律论证理论——作为法律证立理论的理性论辩理论》是法律论证理论的巅峰之作，，目前研究法律逻辑，特别是法律论辩都以该著作为一个必要的切入点。法律规范只有得到充分的论证，才能获得人们的信服与认可。因此，加强法律论证研究，具有重要的理论和现实意义。在深入研究阿列克西理性论辩理论的基础上，文章首先对阿氏理论的脉络进行了系统介绍，进而完整地展示阿氏理论的重要内容。其次，采用比较的方法对阿氏理论的成就与问题进行了分析，如“法律需要论证”观念的确立、用“可接受性”取代“真实性”和作为“理论范式”的代表，这些成就是众目共睹的，而论证的等级问题、不能从形式证出内容等问题是阿氏理论的缺陷。最后，对建构一种新的理性论辩理论进行了探讨。在充分透彻地剖析了阿氏理论的基础上，结合当代孙斯坦未完全化法律论证理论和诠释性法哲学带来的启发，文章提出一种新型的理性论辩理论，它是在阿氏理论框架内的重建。在内部证成方面，放弃一些模棱两可的内部证成规则，在进行实践性问题的理论选择或事实处理时，通过提升问题的抽象程度或者降低问题的抽象程度，用具体的实用情形追寻内部证成的规则。在外部证成方面，用追求个案的平衡代替模糊的价值追寻，这样就提升了法律论证理论的实践性和可操作性。该研究不但透彻解析了阿列克西理性论辩理论的相关渊源与内涵，而且在借鉴相关理论研究成果的基础上丰富并尝试解决理性论辩理论的难题，在法律论证理论研究中会起到一定的推动作用。
[Abstract]:Robert Alexis is a famous contemporary German jurist, whose masterpiece, "the Theory of legal argumentation-the Theory of rational argumentation as the Theory of legal proof", is the pinnacle of the theory of legal argumentation, and now studies the logic of law. In particular, legal argumentation takes this work as a necessary starting point. Only if legal norms are fully demonstrated, can they be convinced and recognized. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to strengthen the study of legal argumentation. Based on the in-depth study of Oleksiy's rational argument theory, this paper first introduces the context of Archer's theory systematically, and then presents the important content of Archer's theory completely. The achievements and problems of Archer's theory are analyzed by means of comparative methods, such as the establishment of the concept of "legal necessity demonstration", the substitution of "authenticity" with "acceptability" and the representation of "theoretical paradigm". However, the problem of hierarchy of argumentation, which can not be proved by form, is the defect of Archer's theory. Finally, the paper discusses the construction of a new theory of rational debate. On the basis of a thorough analysis of Archer's theory and the inspiration of modern Sun Stan's theory of incomplete legal argumentation and hermeneutic philosophy of law, this paper puts forward a new theory of rational argumentation. It is a reconstruction within the framework of Archer's theory. In the aspect of internal proof, we give up some ambiguous rules of internal proof, and in the course of theoretical choice or factual treatment of practical problems, By enhancing the abstract degree of the problem or reducing the abstract degree of the problem, the rules of internal proof are pursued with specific practical situations. In the aspect of external evidence, the pursuit of case balance is used instead of the fuzzy value pursuit. This has enhanced the practicability and operability of the theory of legal argumentation. This study not only thoroughly analyzes the origin and connotation of Oleksiy's theory of rational argumentation, And on the basis of using the relevant theoretical research results to enrich and try to solve the problem of rational argumentation theory, it will play a certain role in the legal argumentation theory research.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-051

【参考文献】