从“程慕阳案”看移民法遣返的证据规则

发布时间：2018-03-09 09:30

本文选题：境外追逃　切入点：移民法遣返　出处：《法学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：证明外逃人员曾在中国涉嫌严重的非政治犯罪是挫败其在外国获得庇护或难民身份的重要法律步骤,各国法制通常为此种证明规定了基本的证明规则,虽然相对于刑事诉讼或民事诉讼的证明标准,移民法庭所采用的证明标准较为简单,但仍然要求相关证明具有合理性和明晰性,提供的证据材料应当是充分的、可检验的且合乎逻辑的。我国的一些办案机关有时缺乏对外国证据规则的了解,在为外国的移民法遣返程序提供支持时不得要领,导致在相关法律程序中失利。"程慕阳案"可为此类移民法遣返程序中的证明规则提供分析样本,总结并反思该案将有助于我们参照有关国家的法律要求准备和提供证据,以便在境外追逃追赃中赢得主动权。
[Abstract]:Proof that a fugitive has been suspected of a serious non-political offence in China is an important legal step in thwarting his or her asylum or refugee status in a foreign country, and national legal systems usually provide the basic rules of proof for such proof, Although the standard of proof adopted by the Migration Court is relatively simple in relation to the standard of proof in criminal or civil proceedings, it still requires that the relevant proof be reasonable and clear and that the evidentiary material provided should be adequate, Testable and logical. Some of our country's case-handling agencies sometimes lack knowledge of foreign evidentiary rules and do not have the means to support repatriation procedures in foreign immigration laws. The "Cheng Muyang case" may provide an analytical sample of the rules of proof in the repatriation proceedings of such immigration laws. Summing up and reflecting on the case will help us prepare and provide evidence in the light of the legal requirements of the countries concerned. In order to win the initiative in the pursuit of foreign pursuit of stolen goods.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：黄风教授主持的国家社科基金2015年一般项目《境外追逃追赃国际司法合作与国内立法完善研究》(项目批准号:15BFX188)的成果之一
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5

【相似文献】