美国辩诉交易制度研究
发布时间:2018-03-09 14:44
本文选题:美国 切入点:辩诉交易 出处:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:辩诉交易制度于十九世纪初发端于美国,经过二百多年的发展,日趋完善,现如今,辩诉交易制度已经突破了法律传统的梗桔,超越了不同法律制度的限制,在世界范围内迅猛发展,其影响力波及到了传统大陆法系国家、联合国刑事法庭及我国。作为世界许多国家刑事诉讼法规定的一项特别审判程序,辩诉交易历经多年发展现已形成一套较为成熟的制度体系。近年来,我国法学界也逐渐开始对辩诉交易这一制度进行研究、探讨。学者们不仅在制度层面上探究其合理性和可行性,还洞察隐藏在制度后面更深层次的观念、传统文化、民族习性,以及一系列司法制度所固化或强化了的社会心理和司法理念的异同。进而,我国司法机关在实行普通程序简易化改革中,对辩诉交易这一具体制度并不是仅仅停留在关注、研究、讨论的层面上,而是已有了具体的、个别的实践。为此,认真审视美国辩诉交易制度的内在机理以及运行模式对我国司法制度的建设有着积极的意义。本文共分三部分。第一部分为美国辩诉交易制度概述。从美国辩诉交易制度的概念与特征、思想与文化渊源以及形成等三个方面对美国的辩诉交易制度进行了介绍,使我们对美国的辩诉交易制度有一个全方位的了解。第二部分为辩诉交易的运作模式。主要是介绍美国辩诉交易制度主体架构、运行机制及其产生的法律效力。从整体上解释阐明美国辩诉交易制度的基本结构、程序操作、运行模式以及其产生的法律效果,清晰明了地呈现出美国辩诉交易制度的的运行机制。第三部分为美国辩诉交易制度的评述。该部分是本文的重中之重。主要论述了四个方面内容:一是对美国辩诉交易制度的价值与作用给予阐释。二是从美国辩诉交易制度现实运行和实践操作中暴露出的缺陷与弊端加以说明。三是美国辩诉交易制度理论分歧。四是通过对美国辩诉交易制度的整体认识,总结出美国辩诉交易制度的现实启示。
[Abstract]:Plea bargaining originated in the United States at the beginning of nineteenth Century, after more than 200 years of development, gradually perfect, nowadays, plea bargaining system has broken through the traditional legal stem orange, beyond the laws of different constraints, the rapid development in the world, the influence of wave and to the traditional civil law countries, the United Nations the Criminal Court and China. As a special trial procedure in the criminal procedure law in many countries of the world, plea bargaining after years of development has formed a relatively mature system. In recent years, our country law also gradually began to study on the system of plea bargaining scholars not only explore the discussion. The rationality and feasibility in the system level, but also insight into the hidden in the system behind the deeper concept, traditional culture, national habits, as well as a series of judicial system curing or strengthen the social psychology The similarities and differences of the concept of justice. Furthermore, China's judicial organs in the implementation of a simple reform of the ordinary procedure, on the plea that the specific system is not merely concern, research, discussion, but there were specific, individual practice. Therefore, there is positive significance of the construction of the internal mechanism seriously review of American plea bargaining system and mode of operation of the judicial system in China. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the plea bargaining system. From the concept of American plea bargaining system and characteristics, introduces the ideological and cultural origin and form three aspects of plea bargaining in America the system enables us to plea bargaining system in the United States have a comprehensive understanding. The second part is the mode of operation of plea bargaining. Mainly is the introduction of American plea bargaining system main structure, operation mechanism and its method Legal validity. Explain the basic structure of American plea bargaining system from the whole procedure operation, operation mode and the legal effect, clearly showing the American plea bargaining mechanism. The third part is the review of American plea bargaining system. This part is the priority among priorities. Discusses mainly four aspects: one is the value and role of American plea bargaining system is explained. Two from the American plea bargaining system and practical operation practice of defects and shortcomings exposed in operation. The three is to illustrate the American plea trading system. Theoretical differences four is based on a whole American plea bargaining system, summed up the Enlightenment of American plea bargaining system.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D971.2;DD915.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨宇冠;刘曹祯;;辩诉交易制度简论[J];人民检察;2016年11期
2 陈卫东;;认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J];中国法学;2016年02期
3 祁建建;;美国辩诉交易中的有效辩护权[J];比较法研究;2015年06期
4 谷玲;;辩诉交易与刑事和解制度之浅析[J];法制博览;2015年21期
5 陈艳倩;;论新《刑事诉讼法》下的辩诉交易[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2013年07期
6 张语桐;;浅述美国辩诉交易的起源[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年05期
7 李昌盛;;德国刑事协商制度研究[J];现代法学;2011年06期
8 张旭;;我国引入辩诉交易可行性探析[J];中国国情国力;2010年02期
9 约翰·朗本;朱奎彬;;刑讯与辩诉交易[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
10 高珊琦;李杰文;;论被害人权利保护的缺失与补救——以辩诉交易为视点[J];理论导刊;2008年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 郑利明;;诉辩交易的生命力[N];法制日报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 盛文;辩诉交易制度初探[D];山东大学;2008年
2 王莹;辩诉交易制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:1588975
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1588975.html