唐朝司法官吏责任制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 13:19

本文选题：司法官吏　切入点：刑事责任　出处：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：唐朝是中国封建社会发展的鼎盛时期,其政治、经济和文化发展都取得了较高成就。与之相呼应,唐朝也形成了较为完备和成熟的法制体系。唐律是中华法系的代表。唐律集秦汉魏晋等朝代法律之大成,又为宋元明清法律之发展开创先河。唐律中所记载的有关法律思想、法律文化以及法律制度对于我们当前的中国特色社会主义法治建设仍然具有极为重要的参考价值。纵观中国古代法制发展史,司法官吏责任制度作为一项基本的司法制度在中国古代就已经产生并不断发展。直至唐朝,司法官吏责任制度得到了空前的发展和完善。司法官吏责任制度作为维护唐朝诉讼审判活动依法进行的重要制度之一,在唐律中有详尽的阐述。唐朝司法官吏责任制度体系完备,内容详尽,结构严谨,形式统一,成为唐以后各个朝代制定司法官吏责任制度的蓝本,对当今社会也具有重要的借鉴意义。首先,本文介绍了唐朝司法官吏责任制度的一般理论,包括唐朝司法官吏责任制度的基本涵义、历史渊源及唐朝司法官吏责任制度的确立和发展,可以从宏观上看出从夏朝到唐朝这一历史时间段内我国古代司法官吏责任制度发展的基本脉络。其次,对唐朝司法官吏责任制度的基本内容进行归纳。从案件受理、非法刑讯、违法审判以及违法行刑等几个方面着手,通过对不同朝代有关内容进行对比,我们可以看出各个朝代司法官吏责任制度之间的差异,从而为总结唐朝司法官吏责任制度的特点奠定基础。再次,在唐朝司法官吏责任制度基本内容的基础上,分析了唐朝司法官吏责任制度的特点,包括立法特点与实施特点两方面。其立法特点表现为形式上较为系统化、统一化,内容上较为具体化、明确化,总体设计上更加人性化,合理化;其实施特点表现为惩罚方式以刑罚为主,在责任认定上采用连带责任,同时辅以有效的监察措施。在本文的最后部分,重点阐述了唐朝司法官吏责任制度对我国当前法官责任制度改革的启示:我们应当完善法官法中有关法官责任的规定,统一法官责任的认定标准;确保独立审判,明确法官责任界限;我们应当建立多层次的责任追究体系,构建多元化的外部监督机制;同时,我们应当完善法官职业保障制度,加大对法官的人身保障力度,同时提升对法官的物质性与非物质性保障。
[Abstract]:The Tang Dynasty is the heyday of Chinese development of feudal society in its political, economic and cultural development has made higher achievement. With echoes of the Tang Dynasty, has formed a relatively complete and mature legal system. Tang is a representative of Chinese law system. The Tang Dynasty law in Qin Han Wei Jin Dacheng, and create a precedent for the development of the song and Yuan Dynasties the Ming and Qing Dynasties. The law of legal thought is written in the law of Tang Dynasty, legal culture and legal system for our current Chinese socialist construction of rule of law still has very important reference value. China throughout the history of ancient legal liability system, judicial officials as a basic legal system in ancient China had produced and developed. Until the Tang Dynasty, the judicial officials accountability system has been an unprecedented development and perfection. Judicial officials responsibility system as a safeguard judicial activities in accordance with the law of the Tang Dynasty One of the important system, a detailed exposition in the Tang Dynasty. The Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system is complete, detailed, rigorous structure, unified form, since the Tang Dynasties became the blueprint for making judicial officials responsibility system, has important significance for today's society. Firstly, this paper introduces the general theory of the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility the system of the basic meaning of the Tang Dynasty, including the judicial officials responsibility system, the establishment and the development history of the Tang Dynasty and the judicial officials responsibility system, can be seen from the macro basic context from the Xia Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty this historical period of ancient China's judicial officials responsibility system development. Secondly, the basic content of the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system author. From the acceptance of the case, the illegal torture, illegal illegal trial and execution of several aspects of the related content comparison of different dynasties, We can see the difference between each dynasty judicial officials responsibility system, so as to lay the foundation for summing up the characteristics of the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system. Thirdly, based on the basic content of the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system, analyzes the characteristics of the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system, including legislative features and implementation of two aspects of the characteristics of its legislative characteristics. To form a more systematic and unified, the content is more specific, clear, the overall design is more humanized and rational; the characteristics of punishment to punishment, the joint liability in liability, supplemented by effective supervision measures. In the last part of this paper, focuses on the from the Tang Dynasty judicial officials responsibility system of our country's current judge responsibility system reform: we should improve the relevant provisions of the law of judges judge liability, unified judge liability Standard; ensure the judicial independence, the judge responsibility limits; we should establish a multi-level accountability system, constructing the external supervision mechanism; at the same time, we should improve the occupation guarantee system, increase the judge's personal security efforts, and enhance the protection of material and non-material judges.

【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D929

【参考文献】