反规避形态的法律研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 06:33

本文选题：规避　切入点：反规避　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着多边贸易在WTO框架下的发展,关税水平不断下降,各国日趋重视包括反倾销措施在内的各种贸易救济措施的运用。然而,我们看到,在不断加强和完善反倾销立法与实践的同时,一些产品进出口商规避反倾销措施的方法也越来越多样化,手段也越来越高明。这样,就大大降低了反倾销裁决对不公平贸易行为应该具有的矫正效果,进而将继续损害进口国相关产业的利益。鉴于此,反规避措施已经进入了一些国家(地区)及国际组织的立法规划和司法实践中,并将逐步发展成为反倾销法的重要组成部分,尤其是欧盟和美国的反规避立法,规定得最为完善和细致。此外,在GATT/WTO框架内制定反规避措施的进程也在不断发展,例如,乌拉圭回合谈判中提出了“邓克尔草案”,1994年WTO发表的《反规避决定》等等。因此,本文对欧盟、美国以及邓克尔草案中的反规避形态展开研究,以便对我国的反规避立法中规避的形态制定有所借鉴。
[Abstract]:With the development of multilateral trade under the framework of WTO, the tariff level is declining, and countries are paying more and more attention to the application of various trade relief measures, including anti-dumping measures. While constantly strengthening and improving anti-dumping legislation and practice, some product importers and exporters are increasingly diversified and more sophisticated in their methods of circumventing anti-dumping measures. This greatly reduces the corrective effect that anti-dumping awards should have on unfair trade practices, which in turn will continue to harm the interests of the relevant industries in the importing countries. Anti-circumvention measures have entered the legislative planning and judicial practice of some countries (regions) and international organizations, and will gradually develop into an important part of anti-dumping laws, especially the anti-circumvention legislation of the European Union and the United States. In addition, the process of formulating anti-circumvention measures within the framework of the GATT/WTO continues to evolve, for example, the "Dunkel draft" was introduced in the Uruguay Round negotiations, the "Anti-circumvention decision" published by WTO in 1994, and so on. This paper studies the anti-circumvention form in EU, USA and Dunkel draft, so as to draw lessons from the formulation of anti-circumvention legislation in our country.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;D95;D922.294

【相似文献】