立法解释与司法解释的互动关系研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 09:38

本文选题：立法解释　切入点：司法解释　出处：《烟台大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：法律须经解释才能适用。我国当前法律解释体制尚欠成熟，立法解释和司法解释的存废仍争论不休，立法解释虚置，司法解释兴旺却存在越权等问题突出。立法解释与司法解释同属有权法律解释，立法解释与司法解释各有优缺点，且在多方面存在功能的互补，将二者进行关联研究，不仅可以完善法律解释体制，推动立法和司法的发展，对于我国法治进程亦具有十分重要的意义。本文分三个章节探讨立法解释与司法解释的互动关系。在第一章中，通过立法解释与司法解释的概念解读及二者发展历史的现代反思对立法解释与司法解释进行理论上分析。本章第一节从学理、法律上的规定及运作方式三个方面探讨立法解释与司法解释的概念，以确定研究的逻辑起点。第二节通过历史的考察，梳理中西方法律解释发展的脉络，从中获得有益启示，为后文立法解释与司法解释的完善积累素材。第二章，通过对比研究，在充分运用数据的前提下，对立法解释与司法解释的冲突进行实证研究。立法解释大权旁落、长期虚置，且存在闭塞性及程序不规范的现状，使得立法解释几乎为司法解释所取代；司法解释强势发展，但因解释主体混乱，解释内容抽象等饱受合法性质疑。第三章，运用实证的方法，结合具体案例分析，从我国的实际出发展望立法解释与司法解释的未来，，得出二者共存的必要性与可能性。立法解释与我国宪政制度相适应，其权威性、规范性是社会普遍正义得以实现的保障；司法解释因其性质更具创造性与灵活性，在推动立法与司法发展的同时有助于个案正义的实现。立法解释与司法解释的冲突可能打乱社会平衡，这就暴露出法律规范体系的不足，为反思不足或过度提供了契机。直面立法解释与司法解释的冲突，对冲突作更细致、系统的考察，对二者进行关联研究，在获得整体认识之后，提出完善立法解释与司法解释的基本思路与措施。
[Abstract]:The current legal interpretation system of our country is still immature, the existence and abolition of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation are still debated, and the legislative interpretation is void. The prosperity of judicial interpretation has some problems such as ultra vires. The legislative interpretation and the judicial interpretation belong to the right of legal interpretation. The legislative interpretation and the judicial interpretation have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there are complementary functions in many aspects. It can not only perfect the system of legal interpretation, promote the development of legislation and judicature, but also play an important role in the process of ruling by law in our country. This paper discusses the interaction between legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation in three chapters. Through the interpretation of the concept of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation and the modern reflection of their development history, this chapter makes a theoretical analysis of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation. In order to determine the logical starting point of the study, the author discusses the concepts of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation from the three aspects of legal regulation and operation mode. The second section combs the development of legal interpretation between China and the West through historical investigation, and obtains beneficial enlightenment from it. For the later legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation of the perfect accumulation of material. The second chapter, through comparative study, makes an empirical study on the conflict between legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation on the premise of making full use of data. The legislative interpretation is almost replaced by the judicial interpretation; the judicial interpretation develops strongly, but because of the confusion of the main body of interpretation, the abstract content of interpretation is questioned by the legitimacy. In the third chapter, the necessity and possibility of the coexistence of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation are obtained from the point of view of the reality of our country, and the legislative interpretation is suitable to the constitutional system of our country, by using the empirical method and combining with the concrete case analysis, and looking forward to the future of the legislative interpretation and the judicial interpretation. Its authoritativeness and normality are the guarantee of the realization of social universal justice, and judicial interpretation, because of its more creative and flexible nature, is helpful to the realization of case justice while promoting the development of legislation and judicature. The conflict between the legislative interpretation and the judicial interpretation may upset the social balance, which exposes the insufficiency of the legal normative system and provides an opportunity to reflect on the insufficiency or excessive. After a systematic investigation and a study of the relationship between the two, the author puts forward the basic ideas and measures to perfect the legislative and judicial interpretation after obtaining the overall understanding.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】