德国侵权法上的继发性损害类型及其启示

发布时间：2018-04-02 14:40

  本文选题：继发性损害　切入点：整体性利益　出处：《现代法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：在标的物所有权移转后因其自身自始即存在的瑕疵,导致物之整体价值减少、无法使用或完全灭失的场合下,当受害人因物之瑕疵担保责任时效期间届满而无法通过合同责任主张法律救济时,德国司法实践为给受害人提供充分法律救济,而通过法之续造,发展出所有权侵害的继发性损害类型,并将之纳入《民法典》第823条第1款的涵摄范畴,为受害人提供了适当的救济方案。对中国的司法实践而言,在中国特色社会主义法律体系已经形成时,审慎关注德国司法实践于此通过规范解释路径处理法之安全性与向社会生活开放性间之紧张关系的有益经验,有助于法院具体案件审理时,能在维护法之安全以及权威的同时保障具体人在法律上的充分实现。
[Abstract]:Where, after the transfer of title to the subject matter, there are defects that exist from the beginning of the subject matter, resulting in the reduction of the overall value of the object, it is impossible to use it or is completely lost,When the victim cannot claim legal relief through contractual liability because of the expiration of the limitation period of guarantee liability in rem, the judicial practice in Germany provides sufficient legal relief to the victim, and through the continuation of the law,The author develops the type of secondary damage of the infringement of ownership, and brings it into the scope of Article 823 (1) of the Civil Code, which provides an appropriate relief scheme for the victim.As far as China's judicial practice is concerned, when the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics has been formed,Careful attention is paid to the beneficial experience of German judicial practice in regulating the tension between the security of the approach to interpretation and openness to social life, which is helpful to the trial of specific cases in the courts.Can safeguard the security and authority of the law while ensuring the full realization of the law.
【作者单位】： 中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市2015年社会科学基金项目(15FXC046) 中央财经大学2014年度中财121人才工程青年博士发展基金(QBJ1407)
【分类号】：D951.6;DD913
，

本文编号：1700879