论波斯纳的实用主义审判观

发布时间：2018-04-06 03:30

本文选题：实用主义审判观　切入点：实用主义　出处：《广西大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：波斯纳的实用主义审判观是在美国急剧变化的当今社会中,在各种新的社会需求要求法律做出改变时应运而生,其本质是一种从后果做出决定的逻辑思维方式,是法官如何运用自由裁量权以发展法律的理论。由于我国当前处于社会转型期,也面临着各种新的变化与问题。社会发展要求法官积极面对新的法律问题而不是选择回避。本文论述了波斯纳实用主义审判观产生的历史背景及其要解决的主要问题、波斯纳的实用主义审判观的理论基础、实用主义审判观的内容以及对实用主义审判观的批判与反思、波斯纳的实用主义审判观对我国司法实践的启示等,目的在于通过对波斯纳实用主义审判观的研究,更深刻的理解法官的司法裁判行为,更深一步剖析影响法官裁判的因素和法官裁判中运用的法律推理方法。在我国司法实践的时空背景中,针对我国司法实践面对的问题,描绘出我国司法审判理论的理想图景。作者认为法官在司法审判的过程中进行着手段-目的理性式的思维方式。这种思维要求法官在考虑问题时具体情况具体分析,通过对各种可能的解决方法所带来的后果的衡量,选择可以带来好的结果的决定,以达到法律效果和社会效果的统一。这是一种解决问题的实用主义的方法,是一种面向未来、考虑结果、考虑具体情况的科学探究式思维,是法官行使自由裁量权的科学化方法,对我国司法实践具有重要借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Posner's pragmatism trial view came into being in the rapidly changing society of the United States, when all kinds of new social needs required the law to change, and its essence was a logical way of thinking which made decisions from the consequences.It is how to use discretion to develop the theory of law.Because our country is in the social transition period, also faces each kind of new change and the question.Social development requires judges to actively face new legal issues rather than choose to withdraw.This paper discusses the historical background of Posner's pragmatism trial view and the main problems to be solved, the theoretical basis of Posner's pragmatism trial view, the content of pragmatism trial view, and the criticism and reflection on pragmatism trial view.The enlightenment of Posner's pragmatism trial view to the judicial practice of our country is to understand the judge's judicial judgment behavior more deeply through the study of Posner's pragmatism trial view.A further analysis of the factors that affect the judge's decision and the method of legal reasoning used in the judge's judgment.In the time and space background of our country's judicial practice, the ideal picture of our country's judicial trial theory is described in view of the problems that our country's judicial practice faces.The author thinks that the judge carries on the means-objective rational mode of thinking in the course of judicial trial.This kind of thinking requires the judge to analyze the concrete situation when considering the problem, through the measure of the consequences brought by various possible solutions, to choose the decision that can bring good result, in order to achieve the unification of the legal effect and the social effect.This is a pragmatic approach to solving problems, a scientific inquiry thinking that looks forward to the future, considers the results and considers the specific circumstances. It is a scientific method for judges to exercise their discretion.It has important reference significance to the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】