犯罪竞合的体系位置与原则——以德国竞合理论为参照

发布时间：2018-04-06 06:20

本文选题：禁止重复评价原则　切入点：全面评价原则　出处：《比较法研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：犯罪竞合处于定罪与量刑的交叉与冲突点上。德国犯罪竞合理论一方面严格遵循行为数即罪数的定罪规则,另一方面又必须贯彻禁止重复评价与全面评价的量刑原则。不真正法条竞合名为法条竞合,却行想象竞合之实,是罪数规则与量刑原则冲突妥协的产物。这导致了德国法条竞合理论内部的体系混乱,以及其与想象竞合之间界限的模糊。在继受德国犯罪竞合理论的过程中,在解决我国刑法所面临的特定竞合问题时,应当回归竞合的基本原则。只有从禁止重复评价与全面评价的量刑原则出发,才能正确理解法条竞合与想象竞合区分的必要性,才能正确处理罪量相关的中国式竞合问题。若两罪规定了不同性质与类型的定量要素,即便在定性要素上存在一般与特殊的关系,也应按照想象竞合的规则从一重处断。
[Abstract]:Crime concurrence lies in the intersection and conflict of conviction and sentencing.On the one hand, German criminal concurrence theory strictly follows the conviction rule of the number of acts, on the other hand, it must carry out the sentencing principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation and comprehensive evaluation.It is the result of the conflict between the number of crimes and the principle of sentencing.This leads to the confusion of the system within the German law theory and the blurring of the boundary between it and imagination.In the course of following the theory of criminal concurrence in Germany, we should return to the basic principle of concurrence when solving the problem of special concurrence in criminal law of our country.Only from the sentencing principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation and comprehensive evaluation, can we correctly understand the necessity of distinguishing between competing and imaginative concurrence of laws and articles, and correctly handle the problem of Chinese-style concurrence related to the amount of crime.If the two crimes stipulate the quantitative elements of different properties and types, even if there is a general and special relationship in the qualitative elements, they should be broken from the same place according to the rule of imaginative concurrence.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;南京大学中德法学研究所;
【分类号】：D951.6;DD914

【相似文献】