当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

法人类学视野下的纠纷及纠纷解决研究

发布时间:2018-04-06 21:12

  本文选题:法人类学 切入点:纠纷 出处:《西北师范大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:关于纠纷的研究在法人类学中一直占据着重要的地位,纠纷一直都是法人类学研究的重要内容。本文着重研究法人类学视野中的纠纷,试图对法人类学对纠纷研究的发展与变化进行梳理,对法人类学领域中的纠纷研究进行系统的阐述,研究侧重阐释性,进而提出了法人类学纠纷研究对于我国法学研究的有益启示。本文共六部分: 第一部分导论。介绍法人类学纠纷研究的目的与意义。本文的研究对象是法人类学视野中的纠纷,研究的意义旨在通过阐释纠纷解决机制的文化属性和地方特性,区分纠纷处理的要素,以便更好的理解其赖以存在的条件,使各种利益相对协调,各种价值观和谐共存,各种社会机制有机互动,运用多元化的规范和纠纷解决机制,使得冲突和纠纷得以最平和、经济和有效的解决。 第二部分法人类学概述。首先对法人类学的概念进行介绍与阐释,提出法人类学相对于规范法学而言,展示的是一种别具特色、行之有效的思考进路和研究方法。其次通过分析法人类学与文化人类学、法社会学等相关学科的关系,厘清了法人类学的研究对象与研究方法。 第三部分阐释法人类学语境下的纠纷与纠纷解决。首先介绍法人类学纠纷研究的理论背景,法人类学对于纠纷的研究都是从纠纷的价值和意义世界入手的,是以法律的可持续多样性和法律多元为架构的。通过对法人类学纠纷研究的理论背景的介绍,为后面进一步分析打下了基础。 第四部分回顾、归纳了法人类学纠纷及纠纷解决研究的两种路径。介绍法人类学关于纠纷研究的两个不同阶段,分析法人类学关于纠纷研究的历史演进。 第五部分分析法人类学纠纷及纠纷解决研究的当代趋势。 第六部分总结法人类学关于纠纷及纠纷解决研究对于我国法学研究的有益启示。
[Abstract]:The study of disputes has always occupied an important position in legal anthropology, and dispute has always been an important part of the study of legal anthropology.This paper focuses on the disputes in the field of legal anthropology, tries to sort out the development and changes of the dispute research in legal anthropology, systematically expounds the dispute research in the field of legal anthropology, and emphasizes on the interpretation.Furthermore, it puts forward the beneficial enlightenment of the dispute study of legal anthropology to the legal research of our country.This paper consists of six parts:The first part is introduction.This paper introduces the purpose and significance of the study of disputes in legal anthropology.The research object of this paper is disputes in the perspective of legal anthropology. The significance of the study is to distinguish the elements of dispute resolution by explaining the cultural attributes and local characteristics of dispute resolution mechanism, so as to better understand the conditions on which they exist.Make all kinds of interests relatively coordinate, all kinds of values coexist harmoniously, all kinds of social mechanism interact organically, use the pluralistic norm and the dispute resolution mechanism, make the conflict and the dispute to be most peaceful, economical and effective solution.The second part is an overview of legal anthropology.First of all, the concept of legal anthropology is introduced and explained, and it is put forward that legal anthropology shows a unique and effective way of thinking and research in comparison with normative jurisprudence.Secondly, by analyzing the relationship between anthropology and cultural anthropology, sociology of law and other related disciplines, this paper clarifies the research object and method of legal anthropology.The third part is the dispute and dispute settlement in the context of Anthropology of hermeneutics.Firstly, it introduces the theoretical background of the dispute research in legal anthropology, which is based on the world of value and significance of dispute, and is based on the sustainable diversity of law and pluralism of law.By introducing the theoretical background of legal anthropology dispute research, this paper lays a foundation for further analysis.The fourth part reviews the two ways of legal anthropology dispute and dispute resolution.This paper introduces two different stages of dispute study in legal anthropology, and the historical evolution of dispute study in analytic anthropology.The fifth part analyzes the contemporary trend of anthropological dispute and dispute resolution.The sixth part summarizes the beneficial enlightenment of legal anthropology on disputes and dispute resolution.
【学位授予单位】:西北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D90-05

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 罗洪洋;;法人类学论纲——兼与法社会学比较[J];法商研究;2007年02期

2 张冠梓;法人类学的理论、方法及其流变[J];国外社会科学;2003年05期

3 乔丽荣;仲崇建;;从博弈到认同——法人类学关于纠纷研究的旨趣、路径及其理论建构[J];黑龙江民族丛刊;2005年06期

4 孙新强;;卢埃林现实主义法理学思想[J];法制与社会发展;2009年04期

5 苏力;再论法律规避[J];中外法学;1996年04期



本文编号:1718923

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1718923.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6fae8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com