“亲亲相隐”的法伦理思考
发布时间:2018-05-14 16:29
本文选题:“亲亲相隐” + 法伦理 ; 参考:《南华大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:“亲亲相隐”在中国的法制史和中国传统伦理思想史中都曾有过很深的影响。也是在当时很受关注,到现在依然热议的话题。随着我国法律机制的不断健全与完善,越来越多的法学家呼吁把“亲亲相隐”入律。这个问题在我国的法学界有颇多的研究和关注,但从法伦理的角度来深究这一问题的论文和著作相对而言还比较少。本文试图从法伦理的角度出发对“亲亲相隐”的相关问题进行思考,从而对“亲亲相隐”有更深的认识,以期待对该问题的研究能更完善。全文分为四章: 第一章:“亲亲相隐”的历史演变及其理论基础。先对“亲亲相隐”在中国从先秦时期到当代的历史演变进行了较为全面的的总结归纳。紧接着对其在中国演变特征进行了分析研究。其次对“亲亲相隐”存在的四个理论基础进行了分析。第二章:“亲亲相隐”的实质及其法伦理价值。本章从三个方面论述了“亲亲相隐”的实质并对其进行了评价。接着对“亲亲相隐”的法伦理价值进行了多方面的分析、归纳。 第三章:我国大陆和港澳台地区有关“亲亲相隐”立法现状及比较。这一章先对我国大陆及其港澳台地区有关“亲亲相隐”的立法现状进行了归纳总结,其次对港澳台地区关于“亲亲相隐”相关的立法进行了比较分析。 第四章:从“亲亲相隐”探析我国亲属作证特免权制度的构建。本章首先对我国缺失亲属作证特免权的原因进行了分析。其次对“亲亲相隐”在我国现代存在的可能性及亲属作证特免权制度的构建模式进行了探析研究。
[Abstract]:"close relatives and close relatives" have had a deep influence in the history of Chinese legal system and Chinese traditional ethical thought. It was also a subject of great concern at that time, and still a hot topic to this day. With the perfection and perfection of our country's legal mechanism, more and more jurists call for the "close relatives" to be hidden into the law. This problem has a lot of research and attention in the field of law in our country, but there are few papers and works to study this problem from the angle of law ethics. From the angle of legal ethics, this paper attempts to think about the related problems of "closeness of kinship and kinship", so as to have a deeper understanding of "closeness of kinship and kinship", in order to look forward to a more perfect study on this issue. The full text is divided into four chapters: The first chapter: the historical evolution and theoretical basis of "close and close to each other". Firstly, the author summarizes the historical evolution from the pre-Qin period to the present age in China. Then it analyzes the characteristics of its evolution in China. Secondly, it analyzes the four theoretical bases of the existence of "close relatives and close relatives". The second chapter: the essence and legal ethics value of "close relatives and close relatives". This chapter discusses and evaluates the essence of "closeness of kinship and kinship" from three aspects. Then, the author analyzes and concludes the legal ethics value of "close relatives hidden". The third chapter: the current situation and comparison of the legislation about "close relatives" in mainland China and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. In this chapter, the author summarizes the current situation of the legislation in mainland China and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and then makes a comparative analysis of the relative legislation in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. Chapter four analyzes the construction of the privilege system of relatives testifying from the perspective of "the concealment of kinship and kinship". This chapter first analyzes the reasons for the absence of the privilege of relatives to testify in China. Secondly, it analyzes the possibility of the existence of "close relatives" in modern China and the construction mode of the privilege system of relatives testifying.
【学位授予单位】:南华大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D90-053;D909.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 范忠信;亲亲相为隐:中外法律的共同传统——兼论其根源及其与法治的关系[J];比较法研究;1997年02期
2 孔庆萍;赵秀梅;;从“亲亲相隐”制度看中国传统法律思想的基础——兼论“亲亲相隐”制度于当代重构之法律思想基础[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
3 梁晓杰;;法律正义和正义美德[J];道德与文明;2006年06期
4 欧锦雄;期待可能性理论的继承与批判[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年05期
5 王伟;闫鹏;;从“亲亲相隐”探析我国亲属免证制度的构建[J];湖北社会科学;2008年06期
6 张本顺;;“亲亲相隐”制度的刑事立法研究[J];法学杂志;2006年06期
7 江学;亲亲相隐及其现代化[J];法学评论;2002年05期
8 刘荣军;论证人的证言拒绝权[J];法学;1999年05期
9 朱佳;;暗合与差异——论亲亲相隐与证人作证义务[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年04期
10 丁文芳;;“亲亲相隐”制度及其刑事立法化[J];法制与社会;2008年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 李竹;亲属拒绝作证权研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
2 孙晶;亲属作证特免权研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
3 熊丹丹;论“亲亲相隐”原则的合理性及其借鉴[D];南昌大学;2008年
,本文编号:1888637
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1888637.html