问题的多面性及其对策——中国法律史学困境的知识运行解读

发布时间：2018-05-30 06:10

本文选题：中国法律史学 + 知识运行　；参考：《江苏社会科学》2016年02期

【摘要】：中国法律史学处于困境的原因是多方面的,而对于历史的实用态度使人们忽视了中国法律史学困境的多元性。从知识运行的角度来说,中国法律史知识在生产、传播以及接受层面均存在问题。在知识生产阶段,中国法律史知识的客观性受到质疑;在知识传播阶段,中国法律史对现代法学的借鉴意义被漠视;在知识接受阶段,各个主体或只愿做被动的接受者,或被视为只能是被动的接受者。想要解决中国法律史学的困境,首先应该采取传统与多元相结合的研究方法,以保障中国法律史知识生产的客观性;其次,法学各学科均应作为中国法律史知识传播过程的参与者,发掘它的价值;最后,直接的知识接受者也应该能动地利用中国法律史知识,同时,需要改变法学教育中学习西方的填鸭式思维。
[Abstract]:There are many reasons for the dilemma of Chinese legal historiography, but the practical attitude towards history makes people ignore the pluralism of the dilemma of Chinese legal historiography. From the point of view of knowledge operation, there are problems in the production, dissemination and acceptance of knowledge of Chinese legal history. In the stage of knowledge production, the objectivity of Chinese legal history knowledge is questioned; in the stage of knowledge dissemination, the reference meaning of Chinese legal history to modern jurisprudence is ignored; in the stage of knowledge acceptance, each subject is willing to be a passive receiver. Or be regarded as a passive recipient. In order to solve the dilemma of Chinese legal historiography, firstly, we should adopt the traditional and pluralistic research methods to ensure the objectivity of the knowledge production of Chinese legal history. Each discipline of law should be a participant in the process of knowledge dissemination of Chinese legal history, and discover its value. Finally, the direct knowledge receiver should also make use of the knowledge of Chinese legal history actively, and at the same time, There is a need to change the cramming thinking of learning from the West in law education.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】