加拿大行政纠纷调解机制研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 09:20

本文选题：加拿大 + 行政纠纷调解机制　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在处理政府与公民之间的纠纷过程中，加拿大十分注重调解作用的发挥，，因而，加拿大行政纠纷调解机制无论从理念、机构设置、还是程序安排、人员委任等各个方面，均相对完善。对于目前正面临着传统行政纠纷解决机制失灵的我国而言，不无重要借鉴意义。因此，本文主要在对加拿大行政纠纷调解机制的介绍和分析基础之上，对我国行政纠纷调解机制提出一些建设性意见。就具体结构而言，本文主要分为五个部分对加拿大行政纠纷调解机制进行了研究。第一部分介绍调解得以在加拿大产生和发展的背景，这主要包括：加拿大自身历史发展过程中所形成的“协商”的法律文化精神；调解在世界各国的兴起对加拿大所产生的冲击；现实对调解的需求或者说调解本身存在的优点，也是加拿大行政纠纷选择采纳调解的一个原因；加拿大调解从私域到公域跨越中对传统文化的突破。第二部分主要是对加拿大具有调解职能的三大机构的调解职能进行了一个总括性的介绍，包括加拿大行政裁判所、行政监察专员制度以及法院在司法审查过程中的调解职能，这部分又主要以对行政裁判所的介绍为主，从调解机构的设置、调解程序、调解员的委任、调解程序的中立性、调解协议的效力等几个方面进行展开，行政监察专员制度和法院仅做一个概括的介绍，其中，行政监察专员制度主要选取了加拿大护照局作为切入点予以分析，而法院则主要对其司法审查过程中的调解职能进行了综合分析。第三部分主要是从整体上对加拿大行政纠纷调解机制的特点的概括，主要包括四个方面：调解运用的广泛性；重视调解过程的中立性；调解程序的可操作性强和强调保密性。第四部分主要论述了加拿大经验对构建我国行政纠纷调解机制的借鉴意义，该部分在分析我国行政纠纷调解存在的问题基础之上，从机构设置、调解程序、调解员的委任、调解过程的中立性和保密性、对调解协议的审查和执行等几个方面提出了建议。第五部分，结语。
[Abstract]:In the process of handling disputes between the government and its citizens, Canada attaches great importance to the role of mediation. Therefore, the Canadian administrative dispute mediation mechanism is based on various aspects, such as ideas, institutional setup, procedural arrangements, personnel appointment, and so on. Are relatively perfect. For our country, which is facing the failure of traditional administrative dispute resolution mechanism, it is of great significance. Therefore, based on the introduction and analysis of the administrative dispute mediation mechanism in Canada, this paper puts forward some constructive suggestions on the administrative dispute mediation mechanism in China. In terms of specific structure, this paper is divided into five parts to study Canadian administrative dispute mediation mechanism. The first part introduces the background of the emergence and development of mediation in Canada, which mainly includes: the legal cultural spirit of "consultation" formed in the course of Canada's own historical development; The rise of mediation in the world has had an impact on Canada, the demand for mediation in reality or the advantages of mediation itself are also one of the reasons why Canadian administrative disputes choose to adopt mediation. The breakthrough of Canadian mediation to traditional culture from private domain to public domain. The second part mainly introduces the mediation functions of Canada's three major institutions, including the Canadian Administrative Court, the administrative ombudsman system and the mediation function of the court in the process of judicial review. This part mainly focuses on the introduction of the administrative adjudicators, starting from the establishment of mediation institutions, mediation procedures, the appointment of mediators, the neutrality of mediation procedures, the effectiveness of mediation agreements, and so on. The administrative ombudsman system and the court only make a general introduction. Among them, the administrative ombudsman system mainly selects the Canadian Passport Office as the entry point to analyze. But the court mainly carries on the comprehensive analysis to its mediation function in the judicial review process. The third part mainly summarizes the characteristics of Canadian administrative dispute mediation mechanism from the whole, mainly includes four aspects: the extensive use of mediation; the attention to the neutrality of mediation process; the strong operability of mediation procedures and the emphasis on confidentiality. The fourth part mainly discusses the significance of Canadian experience in the construction of administrative dispute mediation mechanism in China. Based on the analysis of the problems existing in the mediation of administrative disputes in China, the fourth part mainly discusses the establishment of institutions, mediation procedures, the appointment of mediators. The neutrality and confidentiality of mediation process, the review and implementation of mediation agreement, etc. The fifth part, conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D971.1

【参考文献】