设区的市地方立法权“限制条款”及其妥当性

发布时间：2018-06-12 10:56

本文选题：地方立法权 + 设区的市　；参考：《浙江社会科学》2017年12期

【摘要】：《立法法》将地方立法权主体扩大到所有设区的市,但设置了"限制条款"。判断地方立法与上位法是否"相抵触原则",其标准是(1)在权利与义务关系中,下位法限缩、取消上位法已经确认的权利或者扩大、增加上位法没有设置的义务;(2)在职权和职责关系中,下位法扩大、增加上位法没有授予的职权或者限缩、取消上位法已经设置的职责。对"限制条款"中的事项应当作扩大性解释,以适应地方经济与社会发展的需要,且"等"也应作"等外等"解释。对地方立法权设置限制的目的具有正当性,但在所采取的手段上,与目的之间存在着关联性的欠缺,若不作一些补救性的对策,如立法解释、强化人大立法主导性,甚至推进"合宪性审查工作"等,国家法制统一的立法目的恐怕难以实现。
[Abstract]:The Legislative Law extends local legislative power to all municipalities with district powers, but sets "restriction clauses". To judge whether local legislation and superior law are "in conflict with the principle", its standard is: (1) in the relationship between rights and obligations, the lower law limits the limitation, cancels or expands the rights recognized by the upper law. In the relationship between authority and duty, the lower law expands, increases the power or limit that the upper law does not grant, and cancels the duty that the upper law has set up. In order to meet the needs of local economic and social development, the items in "restriction clause" should be interpreted in an expanded way, and "etc" should also be interpreted as "equal and equal". The purpose of setting restrictions on the local legislative power is legitimate, but there is a lack of correlation between the means adopted and the purpose. If some remedial countermeasures are not made, such as legislative interpretation, strengthening the leading role of the people's Congress in legislation, Even to promote the "constitutionality review", the legislative purpose of the unification of the national legal system may be difficult to achieve.
【作者单位】：浙江大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.0

【相似文献】