美国致害诋毁侵权与诽谤侵权之比较

发布时间：2018-06-12 13:50

本文选题：致害诋毁 + 诽谤　；参考：《河南财经政法大学学报》2014年03期

【摘要】：产权诽谤和商品贬损是致害诋毁侵权的常见形式。致害诋毁侵权与诽谤侵权有共性也有差异。致害诋毁行为的本质是对经济关系的非法干扰,其规则保护的对象是第三人与被侵权人的经济关系,维护良好的市场交易秩序是其价值追求。致害诋毁侵权与诽谤侵权有着不同的历史渊源,宪法规则对普通法诽谤侵权规则的修正不会根本性地消弭两者的差别。作为一种经济损害侵权的致害诋毁侵权具有独特的理论和实践价值。
[Abstract]:Defamation of property rights and derogatory goods are common forms of injurious libel infringement. There are similarities and differences between slander infringement and slander infringement. The essence of injurious and defamatory behavior is illegal interference to economic relations, the object of its rule protection is the economic relationship between the third party and the infringed party, and the value pursuit is to maintain a good market transaction order. There are different historical origins between injurious defamation tort and libel tort. The amendment of constitutional rules to common law libel tort rules will not fundamentally eliminate the difference between them. As a kind of economic damage tort, injurious defamation infringement has unique theoretical and practical value.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D923;D971.2

【相似文献】