裁判行为的认知心理学阐释

发布时间：2018-06-28 14:06

本文选题：裁判行为 + 格式塔理论　；参考：《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年04期

【摘要】：心理学中的格式塔理论和联结主义表征,从发生学上阐明了法律现实主义者没能讲清楚的直觉裁判问题,并为认识裁判行为或司法决策提供了一套较精细的工具。依据格式塔理论的"趋完性"特征,能够解释裁判之际的推理过程,以及法官从结果出发进行法律推理的现象。在疑难案件中,左右裁判行为的约束满足机制,是"趋完性"特征与联结主义模型相结合的结果。融贯性作为这一机制的核心要素,指导了对命题和推理的激活和调整过程,并使裁判行为最终表现为在两组命题集合之间选择更融贯的一组。因此,融贯性不仅是裁判行为和司法说理的一项内在要求,也是判断司法决定之优劣的一个标准。
[Abstract]:Gestalt theory and connectionism in psychology clarify the intuitionistic judgment problem which the legal realist fails to explain clearly from the perspective of generology and provides a set of more elaborate tools for the understanding of adjudication behavior or judicial decision. On the basis of Gestalt's characteristic of "finality", it can explain the reasoning process at the time of judgment and the phenomenon of judge proceeding legal reasoning from the result. In difficult cases, the binding and satisfying mechanism of the judgment behavior is the result of the combination of the characteristics of "finality" and the connectionism model. As the core element of this mechanism, meltiness guides the process of activation and adjustment of proposition and reasoning, and finally makes the judgment behavior manifest as a more coherent set between the two sets of propositions. Therefore, consistency is not only an inherent requirement of judicial behavior and reasoning, but also a criterion to judge the merits and demerits of judicial decisions.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目“司法决策的心理学研究”(项目编号:NCET-13-0512) 国家社科基金项目“疑案裁判中的法律判断模型研究”(项目编号:10CFX033)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】