中国城市法治发展可比性研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 17:10

  本文选题：城市 + 法治发展　； 参考：《华南理工大学》2016年博士论文

【摘要】：我国城市法治发展具有差异是不争的事实。法学界对此展开的研究呈现出一个有趣的现象。1.部分学者对客观存在的“不平衡”现象重视不够;2.部分学者认真对待城市法治发展的差异,研究微观层面的城市治理法治化问题,但对城市与法治发展关系的认识存在盲点;3.随着我国城市问题的普遍化,更多学者从宏观层面着手对各地差异进行比较,但对比较中的“可比性”这一关键问题存在研究上的空白。本文正是对上述三个“模糊”问题展开探讨。从城市与法治发展关系出发,围绕我国城市法治评估的可比性问题(能否比较、如何比较),对我国法治发展模式进行研究。研究将夯实城市法治评估的基础,观察转型时期我国的法治发展方式,推动地方法治研究向纵深前进。全文以日常生活实践为研究视角,采用比较研究法,共五章,第一章与第五章为绪论与结论。第二章研究我国城市法治发展可比的基础,解决我国城市法治发展能否进行比较的问题。我国的法治建设是在党的领导下统一推进的。各地各级党委领导干部对法治的认识与选择存在差异,导致其所在的地方法治发展路径不同,形成了特殊的城市法治发展的多样性,这是可比的基础。第三、第四章解决我国城市法治发展如何进行比较的问题。其中,第三章研究我国城市的法治发展模式。我国城市是构建型的法治发展模式。对我国城市进行比较既可以揭示我国法治发展的多样性与城市法治的具体样态,又可以对不同城市法治发展提供可资借鉴的方法与路径。第四章研究我国城市法治发展可比的内容。在比较具有重要意义的基础上,以市民的自主性为城市法治建设的主要标准,结合我国国情,推导出可比的主要内容是权力制约与权利实现。同时,除了对上述两方面的法律制度进行比较,各地法治建设的工作方式也是值得比较的重要内容。我国法治建设的重心在地方。研究我国城市法治发展的可比性,对法治中国进程的推进不无裨益!
[Abstract]:It is an indisputable fact that there are differences in the development of urban rule of law in China. There is an interesting phenomenon in the field of law. Some scholars pay less attention to the objective existence of "imbalance" phenomenon. Some scholars seriously treat the differences in the development of urban rule of law and study the issue of urban governance by law at the micro level, but there are blind spots in the understanding of the relationship between the city and the development of the rule of law. With the generalization of urban problems in China, more and more scholars begin to compare the regional differences from the macro level, but there is a gap in the study of the key issue of "comparability" in comparison. In this paper, the above three "fuzzy" problems are discussed. Based on the relationship between the city and the development of the rule of law, this paper studies the development mode of the rule of law in our country, focusing on the comparability of the evaluation of the rule of law in our country (whether or not and how to compare it). The research will consolidate the foundation of urban rule of law evaluation, observe the development mode of the rule of law in China during the transition period, and promote the study of local rule of law to advance in depth. From the perspective of daily life practice, this paper adopts comparative research method, which consists of five chapters, the first and fifth chapters are the introduction and conclusion. The second chapter studies the comparable basis of the development of urban rule of law in China, and solves the problem of whether the development of urban rule of law in China can be compared. Under the leadership of the Party, the construction of the rule of law in our country is promoted in a unified way. There are differences in the understanding and choice of the rule of law among the leading cadres of the Party committees at all levels, which leads to the different development paths of the local rule of law and forms the diversity of the development of the special urban rule of law, which is the basis of comparison. Third, the fourth chapter solves the problem of how to compare the development of urban rule of law in our country. Among them, the third chapter studies the development mode of the rule of law in Chinese cities. The city of our country is a constructive development mode of the rule of law. The comparison of Chinese cities can not only reveal the diversity of the development of the rule of law and the specific patterns of the urban rule of law, but also provide reference methods and paths for the development of different cities. The fourth chapter studies the comparable content of the development of urban rule of law in China. On the basis of comparative significance, taking citizen's autonomy as the main standard of urban rule of law construction, combined with the national conditions of our country, it is deduced that the comparable main content is power restriction and right realization. At the same time, in addition to the above two aspects of the legal system to compare, the construction of the rule of law in various areas of the work is also worth comparing the important content. The center of gravity of our country rule of law construction lies in the place. The study of the comparability of the development of urban rule of law in China is beneficial to the advancement of the process of the rule of law in China.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D920.0
，

本文编号：2078738