论美国专利侵权中的懈怠抗辩及其借鉴

发布时间：2018-06-28 17:36

本文选题：专利侵权抗辩 + 懈怠制度　；参考：《北京化工大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：美国专利法以及法官围绕专利诉讼制定的判例法在专利权的产生、转移、消灭、使用以及权利的限制和救济方面形成了一个严密、负责、庞大的法律系统。美国法院在审理专利侵权诉讼中,根据衡平法的理论,通过判例对专利权进行了进一步的限定。衡平法规定的抗辩主要有懈怠、禁止反悔、不洁之手原则等。本文拟对懈怠制度发展过程中有重要意义的1893年的莱恩·伯德利公司诉洛克案、1992年的奥克曼公司诉切尼斯建筑公司案、2002年的讯宝科技诉莱门森基金会案、2005年莱门森诉讯宝科技案四个案例进行介绍与分析以期对专利侵权中懈怠抗辩的适用、效力与举证责任问题有清晰的展示与解释。本文接下来对我国现行法律法规中就专利侵权时效制度的规定予以介绍,并结合对案例的分析,展现我国法院在专利侵权诉讼中对诉讼时效制度的具体应用,以及由此暴露出的专利权人恶意利用专利诉讼时效制度,在侵权开始时不主张权利,而等到侵权人不断投资经营发展壮大后,才要求侵权人承担更大数额的侵权损害赔偿及要求停止规模已经变得更大的侵权行为的问题。在此基础上,本文对我国专利侵权抗辩中借鉴懈怠制度提出了相关建议。
[Abstract]:The patent law of the United States and the case law made by the judge around the patent action form a strict, responsible and huge legal system in the aspects of the generation, transfer, elimination, use, restriction and remedy of the patent right. According to the theory of equity, American courts have further limited patent rights in patent infringement litigation. The counterplea stipulated in equity mainly includes slackness, estoppel, unclean hand principle and so on. This paper intends to be of great significance to the development of the slack system in the 1893 case of Ryan Bradley Inc. v. Locke, 1992 Oakman Company v. Chenis Construction Company, 2002 Combo Technology v. Lemenson Foundation, 2005 Lemen This paper introduces and analyzes four cases in Sen v. Xinbao Science and Technology case in order to apply the slackness defense in patent infringement. The issues of validity and burden of proof are clearly demonstrated and explained. The article then introduces the provisions of the patent tort limitation system in the current laws and regulations of our country, and combined with the analysis of cases, it shows the concrete application of the limitation system in patent infringement litigation in our country. And the patent owner's malicious use of the patent limitation system, which reveals that the patentee does not claim the right at the beginning of the infringement, but after the infringer has continuously invested in the operation and developed, The problem of requiring the infringer to bear a larger amount of tort damages and to stop the infringement that has become larger. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward some relevant suggestions on the defense of patent infringement in our country.
【学位授予单位】：北京化工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.42;D971.2

【引证文献】