法治评估理论的跃升空间:实效法治观与我国法治评估实践机制研究
发布时间：2018-07-25 19:46
【摘要】：近年来,伴随着对于法治状态进行现实测量的研究持续发酵,法治评估从应然层面的证立命题已经变成鲜活的生活事实。当前学界对于法治评估的理论基础可以概括为"规范法治观",在思维方向上坚持薄法治与厚法治的二元分析框架:薄法治思维得之于确定性和可预测性,失之于内容的良善或正当性;厚法治得之于具体语境的考量,失之于法治独特意义的殆尽。两者困囿于"法治是什么"的理论罅隙中难以自拔,忽视了法治实施的具体语境和制度环境,影响了法治评估的效能发挥和长效实施机制构建。"实效法治观"的提出,有助于消解薄法治与厚法治的理论鸿沟,着眼于现实世界的法治运行和实施效果,克服当前法治评估实践中的形式主义、工具主义困局,为当前面临转型的法治量化评估提供包容性的理论框架、方法论基础和实施机制,推动法治评估成为检验法治实施效果的可行机制、反馈机制,迈向本土化的转型道路。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of the research on the measurement of the state of the rule of law, the evaluation of the rule of law has become a living fact. At present, the theoretical basis of the evaluation of rule of law in academic circles can be summed up as "normative view of rule of law", and adhere to the dual analytical framework of "thin rule of law" and "thick rule of law" in the direction of thinking: thin rule of law thinking gains certainty and predictability. Lack of good or legitimacy of content; thick rule of law obtained from the consideration of specific context, lost to the unique significance of the rule of law. They are trapped in the theoretical gap of "what is the rule of law", neglecting the specific context and institutional environment of the implementation of the rule of law, and affecting the effectiveness of the evaluation of the rule of law and the construction of a long-term implementation mechanism. " The concept of effective rule of law "is helpful to clear up the theoretical gap between the rule of law and the thick rule of law, to focus on the operation and effect of the rule of law in the real world, to overcome the formalism and instrumentalism dilemma in the practice of evaluating the rule of law at present." It provides an inclusive theoretical framework, methodological basis and implementation mechanism for the quantitative evaluation of the rule of law facing the transition, and promotes the evaluation of the rule of law to become a feasible mechanism to test the effect of the implementation of the rule of law, a feedback mechanism and a way to the localization of the transition.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“司法透明指数研究”(13AFX012) 中国法学会法治评估方阵重点课题“法治评估方法和指标比较研究” 浙江省2017年度教育科学规划课题“高校应对突发性事件的能力评估和提升策略研究”(2017SCG215)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of the research on the measurement of the state of the rule of law, the evaluation of the rule of law has become a living fact. At present, the theoretical basis of the evaluation of rule of law in academic circles can be summed up as "normative view of rule of law", and adhere to the dual analytical framework of "thin rule of law" and "thick rule of law" in the direction of thinking: thin rule of law thinking gains certainty and predictability. Lack of good or legitimacy of content; thick rule of law obtained from the consideration of specific context, lost to the unique significance of the rule of law. They are trapped in the theoretical gap of "what is the rule of law", neglecting the specific context and institutional environment of the implementation of the rule of law, and affecting the effectiveness of the evaluation of the rule of law and the construction of a long-term implementation mechanism. " The concept of effective rule of law "is helpful to clear up the theoretical gap between the rule of law and the thick rule of law, to focus on the operation and effect of the rule of law in the real world, to overcome the formalism and instrumentalism dilemma in the practice of evaluating the rule of law at present." It provides an inclusive theoretical framework, methodological basis and implementation mechanism for the quantitative evaluation of the rule of law facing the transition, and promotes the evaluation of the rule of law to become a feasible mechanism to test the effect of the implementation of the rule of law, a feedback mechanism and a way to the localization of the transition.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“司法透明指数研究”(13AFX012) 中国法学会法治评估方阵重点课题“法治评估方法和指标比较研究” 浙江省2017年度教育科学规划课题“高校应对突发性事件的能力评估和提升策略研究”(2017SCG215)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄力平;建国前中国共产党的民主法治观综述[J];甘肃理论学刊;1999年05期
2 杨叶红;浅析四种法治观[J];湖湘论坛;2003年01期
3 朱璇;;浅论人本法治观及其当代价值[J];学理论;2010年34期
4 叶立周;赵睿;;协商法治观初论[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年05期
5 潘佳铭;; 我国先秦和古代希腊法治观简析[J];西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);1992年03期
6 曾，
本文编号：2144880
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2144880.html
