法学研究如何学术——学术史方法的重申

发布时间：2018-07-27 20:55

【摘要】：当下中国法学研究学术性不强的原因主要在于法学研究者自身,因此需要将视线转向学术本身。基于学术史方法是学术最基本方法的判断,可以发现中国法学研究学术性不强的原因在于学术史方法的缺失,这使得中国法学研究中的学术性与非学术性混淆不清;法学难以确立自己学科的独立地位;法学研究中引证混乱并难以发挥学术评价功能;法学研究中学术传统西化倾向严重。而当代中国法学研究学术性完善之路在于:实用标准与学术标准的适度分离,确立学术的独立性与学术评价的独立标准;增强对学术重要性的认识;加强学术史意识,强化学术规范;自觉推动法学学术传统的中国化。学术性、学术史方法并不是我们对法学研究的更高要求,而只是提醒我们在法学研究中首先要回到学术研究的基本方法然后再谈其他方法。
[Abstract]:The reason why the academic nature of Chinese legal research is not strong at present is mainly due to the law researchers themselves, so they need to turn their attention to the academic itself. Based on the judgment of academic history method, it can be found that the lack of academic history method is the reason why Chinese legal research is not academic, which makes the academic and non-academic aspects of Chinese legal research confused. It is difficult for law to establish its own independent position of discipline; confusion of citation in legal research and difficulty in exerting academic evaluation function; westernization tendency of academic tradition in legal research is serious. The way to improve the academic nature of contemporary Chinese legal research lies in: the proper separation of practical standards from academic standards, the establishment of academic independence and independent standards for academic evaluation, the enhancement of understanding of academic importance, the strengthening of awareness of academic history, Strengthen academic norms and consciously promote the localization of the academic tradition of law. Academically, the method of academic history is not our higher request for the study of law, but it only reminds us that we should first return to the basic method of academic research and then talk about other methods in the research of law.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学理论与法治发展研究中心;黑龙江大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】