论以分离原则为基础的财产权交易规则——法国法的原貌与中国法的未来
发布时间：2018-07-27 17:45
【摘要】：无论哪一法域,其财产权交易规则均由标准化对物权(物权)移转、设立规则和权利交易过程中利益冲突关系处理规则两部分构成,区别的关键在于,这两套规则究竟是相互分离还是混而不分的关系。比较法学说因未能体察到法国法与德国法在权利理论、所有权观念、法律思维模式等方面的差异,将法国法归为"意思主义物权变动模式"之典范,这不仅使法国财产权交易规则的真相被长期掩盖,也使得德国权利交易规则的弊端未能得到真正的检讨。我物权法登记对抗主义立法例虽然赋予合同以双重效力,但对登记制度之功能的把握仍迥异于法国法。在司法解释越来越频繁地超越、否弃物债两分理论核心要求的背景下,法国法的实践对于确定我国财产权交易规则未来发展的方向具有重大启发意义。
[Abstract]:In any jurisdiction, the transaction rules of property rights are transferred by the standardization of real right (real right). The rules of establishment and the rules of dealing with conflicts of interest in the course of transaction of rights consist of two parts. The key to the difference lies in the difference between them. Whether the two sets of rules are separate or mixed. The theory of comparative law has failed to understand the differences between French law and German law in the theory of rights, the concept of ownership, the mode of legal thinking, and so on, so that French law is classified as the model of "the change mode of property right of will doctrine". This not only makes the truth of French property rights trading rules long hidden, but also makes the malpractice of German rights trading rules fail to be truly reviewed. Although the legislation of countervailing doctrine in real right law gives double effect to the contract, the function of the registration system is still quite different from that of the French law. Under the background that the judicial interpretation is more and more frequent and the core requirement of the two-part theory of whether to dispose of the rem debt, the practice of French law has great enlightening significance to determine the direction of the future development of the property right transaction rules of our country.
【作者单位】： 北京交通大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.0;D956.5
本文编号：2148659
[Abstract]:In any jurisdiction, the transaction rules of property rights are transferred by the standardization of real right (real right). The rules of establishment and the rules of dealing with conflicts of interest in the course of transaction of rights consist of two parts. The key to the difference lies in the difference between them. Whether the two sets of rules are separate or mixed. The theory of comparative law has failed to understand the differences between French law and German law in the theory of rights, the concept of ownership, the mode of legal thinking, and so on, so that French law is classified as the model of "the change mode of property right of will doctrine". This not only makes the truth of French property rights trading rules long hidden, but also makes the malpractice of German rights trading rules fail to be truly reviewed. Although the legislation of countervailing doctrine in real right law gives double effect to the contract, the function of the registration system is still quite different from that of the French law. Under the background that the judicial interpretation is more and more frequent and the core requirement of the two-part theory of whether to dispose of the rem debt, the practice of French law has great enlightening significance to determine the direction of the future development of the property right transaction rules of our country.
【作者单位】： 北京交通大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.0;D956.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐涤宇;法国法系原因理论的形成、发展及其意义[J];环球法律评论;2004年04期
2 洪永红;瞿栋;;论殖民时期法国法在黑非洲的移植[J];西亚非洲;2006年01期
3 罗瑶;;法国法中的侵权过错概念及其对我国立法的借鉴意义[J];比较法研究;2010年01期
4 米健;;罗马法对法国法的影响[J];法国研究;1986年02期
5 粟烟涛;法国法院在重复诉讼中的管辖权[J];法国研究;2000年02期
6 孙平;;法国法中犯罪行为引起侵权损害赔偿之司法救济[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年03期
7 李军;;法国法关于无权处分中买受人之救济制度[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年04期
8 直江真一;周建雄;;英美法与大陆法[J];法律文化研究;2008年00期
9 张莉;;职业生涯再造理论与应用──法国法的启示[J];中国政法大学学报;2011年04期
10 朱国斌;法国关于私生活受尊重权利的法律与司法实践[J];法学评论;1999年03期
，本文编号：2148659
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2148659.html
