论司法判决中的法律解释

发布时间：2018-11-04 08:07

【摘要】：我们生活在法律的调控之中,以法律为准绳。但是,法律是什么?当法律沉默不语、含混不清或模棱两可时,它又如何统摄一切呢?对此,人们的回答都诉诸于法律解释。法律解释作为一门古老的学问,到近代逐渐发展已成为相对独立的智识贡献来源。从法律解释的历史发展来看,各国的法律学者对法律解释从各个不同的侧面进行了深入而有益的探索,并取得了较大的进展。近二十年来我国社会主义民主与法制建设取得了令人瞩目的成就,社会主义法制不断到加强和完善,不少法律工作者和学者都十分重视法律解释及其研究,提出了许多建议。随着社会经济的迅速发展,即使是经过周密思考而制定的成文法,面对日新月异、变化异常的客观情况也只能是相对完善,法律的不完善性不断在实践中显现;如果从理解的意义上认识法律解释,那么可以说,法律解释乃是法律的生命之所在。因为没有人理解、解释和运用法律,法律便没有任何价值。因此,对法律的解释也就自然而然地成了法律人的迫切任务。从理论上说,有法律,就有对法律的理解和解释活动,从法律适用意义上讲,法律适用的过程即是法律解释的过程。而对社会生活具有终局裁量权的司法活动而言,研究其判决中的法律解释显得尤为重要。这不仅关系到司法判决的结果是否公正,同时也将影响整个司法活动的运行。本文对法律解释问题的探讨,从对法律解释的宏观分析入手,立足于司法判决这个大背景,着重分析了司法判决中法律解释的对象,即法律规范和法律事实,以及在实际操作过程中解释的方法等问题。本文共分为以下部分: 第一部分,前言。第二部分,法律解释概述部分。在这一部分中,通过对法律解释的概念界定、法律解释的主体及法律解释权、法律解释的情形、法律解释的对象等问题的分析,以求得对法律解释活动的初步认识。第三部分,司法判决的架构及法律解释部分。在这一部分中,文章从司法判决的架构入手,切入到司法判决中的两大核心因素——法律事实和裁判规范,并通过分析法律事实的认定过程和裁判规范的形成过程,阐释了司法判决中法律解释的两大对象的特点。第四部分,司法判决中的法律解释技术。在这一部分中,文章以方法论的分析模式,通过对解释的基本要求,解释的方法的分析,粗略探讨了在司法判决中如何进行法律解释这一问题。本文的粗浅研究,为法律解释如何与司法判决相联系提供了参考意见,希望籍此文能对人们正确认识司法裁判中法律解释的实质、培养法官法律解释的自觉意识和提高其解释方法、技术的运用能力以妥当地适用法律、公正地解决实际问题有所稗益。
[Abstract]:We live in the regulation of the law, with the law as the yardstick. But what is the law? When the law is silent, vague or ambiguous, how does it control everything? To this, people's answer all resort to legal explanation. As an ancient knowledge, legal interpretation has gradually developed into a relatively independent source of intellectual contribution in modern times. From the historical development of legal interpretation, legal scholars of various countries have made a deep and beneficial exploration of legal interpretation from different aspects, and have made great progress. In the past two decades, great achievements have been made in the construction of socialist democracy and legal system in China. The socialist legal system has been continuously strengthened and perfected. Many legal workers and scholars attach great importance to legal interpretation and research, and put forward many suggestions. With the rapid development of social economy, even after careful thinking, the statutory law, faced with the rapid changes, the objective situation of abnormal changes can only be relatively perfect, and the imperfections of the law continue to appear in practice; If we understand the interpretation of law in the sense of understanding, it can be said that the interpretation of law is the life of law. Because no one understands, interprets and applies the law, the law has no value. Therefore, the interpretation of the law naturally becomes the urgent task of the legal person. In theory, there is law, there is the understanding and interpretation of law. In the sense of law application, the process of law application is the process of legal interpretation. For the judicial activities with final discretion in social life, it is particularly important to study the legal interpretation in its judgment. This not only relates to the justice of the judicial decision, but also affects the operation of the whole judicial activity. Based on the macro analysis of legal interpretation and the background of judicial judgment, this paper analyzes the object of legal interpretation in judicial decision, namely, legal norms and legal facts. As well as in the actual operation process explanation method and so on. This article is divided into the following parts: the first part, preface. The second part is an overview of legal interpretation. In this part, through the analysis of the definition of the concept of legal interpretation, the subject of legal interpretation and the power of legal interpretation, the situation of legal interpretation, the object of legal interpretation, and so on, the preliminary understanding of the activities of legal interpretation is obtained. The third part, the structure and legal interpretation of judicial decision. In this part, starting with the structure of judicial decision, the article cuts into the two core factors of judicial decision, namely, legal facts and adjudicative norms, and through analyzing the process of determining the legal facts and the forming process of the adjudicative norms, This paper explains the characteristics of the two objects of legal interpretation in judicial decision. The fourth part, the legal interpretation technology in the judicial decision. In this part, through the analysis of the basic requirements of interpretation and the method of interpretation, the article roughly discusses how to interpret the law in the judicial decision. The brief study of this paper provides a reference for how to link the legal interpretation with the judicial decision, hoping that this article can give people a correct understanding of the essence of the legal interpretation in the judicial adjudication. It is beneficial to cultivate the conscious consciousness of the judge's legal interpretation and to improve its interpretation method, to apply the law properly, and to solve the practical problems fairly.
【学位授予单位】：云南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】