当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

论容隐制度的缺失与回归

发布时间:2019-03-07 16:28
【摘要】:容隐制度曾是中华法系极具特色的一项制度,其依托小农经济为支撑,贯穿儒家文化,维护家国同构的伦理政治,保护封建礼制与纲常,维持统治秩序,并具有人类共同的人性基础,因此在中国历史上存续了几千年之久。然而新中国成立之后,,容隐制度一度被视为“封建糟粕”,“文革”期间,亲人间相互检举揭发反被视为革命行为加以推崇。因此在制定实体法时沿用了“大义灭亲”式的法治理念。在很长一段时期,我国强调打击犯罪、忽视法律的人性基础,彻底摒弃了容隐制度。近年来,虽然我国的刑事法律规范中仍然没有明确的容隐规则,但是司法实践中体现容隐精神的做法却屡见不鲜。容隐制度在中国的法律发展中从春秋时期的萌芽走向隋唐后期的全盛,又经历了建国以后的彻底废除,直至近年来随着社会文明的进一步发展,人权入宪的国际冲击,法律实务界与理论界对容隐制度采取重新接纳的态势,一些地方在司法实践中逐步加入体现容隐精神的规范。容隐制度的上述发展路径背后的原因值得反思与分析。 本文共分为四个章节,第一章介绍了容隐制度。首先从容隐制度的历史发展为起点,总结了每一阶段的具体特征。其次分析了容隐制度在中国历史上长期存在的原因。旨在通过对容隐制度的重新整合找到未来容隐制度回归的路径;第二章分析了容隐制度的理论基础,从两个方面展开,第一,容隐制度的人性基础;第二容隐制度的功能。通过法理角度的分析,提出容隐制度存在的合理性和必要性;第三章分析了容隐制度在现行法律体制中的缺失。一项饱经朝代更迭却屹立不倒的法律制度,缘何在法制现代化的过程中遭到彻底摒弃,其法律背后的原因值得探究,在这部分中还进一步指出了由于容隐制度的缺失而产生的不利后果;第四部分依靠前三部分正反论证提出了对容隐制度回归的展望并对具体制度设计提出建议。
[Abstract]:The system of concealment was a special system in the Chinese legal system. It relied on the small peasant economy as the support, ran through the Confucian culture, maintained the ethical politics of the isomorphism of the family and country, protected the feudal etiquette and program, and maintained the ruling order. And has the common human nature foundation, therefore has existed in the Chinese history for thousands of years. However, after the founding of New China, the system of concealment was once regarded as the "feudal dross", and during the Cultural Revolution, it was praised that family members reported against each other as revolutionary acts. Therefore, in the formulation of substantive law, the concept of rule of law has been adopted. For a long time, our country emphasized the fight against crime, ignored the human nature foundation of the law, and completely abandoned the concealment system. In recent years, although there are still no explicit rules of concealment in the criminal legal norms of our country, the practice of embodied the spirit of concealment in judicial practice is not uncommon. In the legal development of China, the system of concealment went from the sprout of the Spring and Autumn period to the full prosperity of the late Sui and Tang dynasties, and went through the complete abolition after the founding of the people's Republic of China, until recently with the further development of the social civilization, the international impact of human rights entering the Constitution. The system of concealment is re-accepted by the legal practitioners and theorists, and some places gradually add the norms reflecting the spirit of concealment in the judicial practice. The reasons behind the above-mentioned development path of concealment system are worthy of reflection and analysis. This paper is divided into four chapters, the first chapter introduces the system of concealment. First of all, the historical development of concealment system as a starting point, summed up the specific characteristics of each stage. Secondly, it analyzes the reasons for the long-term existence of concealment system in Chinese history. The second chapter analyzes the theoretical basis of the concealment system from two aspects: first, the human nature foundation of the concealment system; the second one is the function of the concealment system. Through the analysis of legal principle, the rationality and necessity of the existence of concealment system are put forward. In the third chapter, the deficiency of concealment system in the current legal system is analyzed. The reason why a legal system, which has survived the changes of the dynasties, has been completely abandoned in the course of the modernization of the legal system, is worthy of exploring the reasons behind its laws. In this part, it further points out the adverse consequences arising from the absence of concealment system; The fourth part puts forward the prospect of the return of the concealment system and puts forward some suggestions on the concrete system design based on the positive and negative arguments of the first three parts.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D929;D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 范忠信;亲亲相为隐:中外法律的共同传统——兼论其根源及其与法治的关系[J];比较法研究;1997年02期

2 江学;亲亲相隐及其现代化[J];法学评论;2002年05期

3 王乐龙;;“亲亲相隐”与近亲拒绝作证规则[J];法治研究;2008年02期

4 干朝端;“亲亲相隐”与现代拒证权[J];江苏公安专科学校学报;2001年02期

5 曾献文;市民社会、市民人性与中国民法典思考[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2002年02期

6 莫洪宪;胡隽;;“亲亲相隐”原则及其活化:以刑事法为视角[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年06期

7 刘鹤玲;;亲缘选择理论:生物有机体的亲缘利他行为及其基因机制[J];华中师范大学学报(自然科学版);2008年01期

8 吴琼阁;;证人消极作证的动机分析及消解对策[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2007年03期

9 年婕;肖祥敏;;从伦理豁免看“亲亲相隐”对中国大陆法制改革的启示[J];学理论;2010年06期

10 李忠良;;“亲亲得相首匿”法律价值析[J];长沙民政职业技术学院学报;2008年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 曾德伟;浅析中国古代容隐制度及其现代价值[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 杨辉;中国“亲亲相隐”制度研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年



本文编号:2436265

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2436265.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8dbe0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com