交易费用视角下治安服务供给主体与作用边界的确定

发布时间：2018-05-14 23:28

本文选题：治安服务 + 交易费用　；参考：《山东社会科学》2009年10期

【摘要】：治安服务供给主体选择及其作用边界确定起决定性作用的因素,是供给过程中产生的交易费用的大小。对于暴力性的执法执勤服务,采取政府供给是节省内外生交易费用的最佳选择;而对于非暴力性的治安防范服务,则可以依据受益人数的多少(俱乐部规模)选择以一种供给方式为主的混合供给模式。因此,将部分治安防范服务由政府部门交由保安市场与社群组织,是节约交易费用、提高供给效率的理性选择。结论与启示:采取政府供给为主的治安服务供给模式是交易费用最小的理性选择;营利性保安企业、社群组织及个人是不可忽视的治安服务供给主体;政府、市场、自愿供给的主体选择及其作用边界是相对的、动态的,不存在一成不变的合理边界。
[Abstract]:The choice of the main body of the supply of public security service and the determination of its function boundary play a decisive role, which is the size of the transaction cost produced in the process of supply. For the violent law enforcement service, government supply is the best choice to save the transaction cost of domestic and foreign students, while for the non-violent public security prevention service, According to the number of beneficiaries (club size), we can choose a mixed supply mode. Therefore, it is a rational choice to save transaction costs and improve the efficiency of supply by transferring some public security services from government departments to security markets and community organizations. Conclusion and revelation: the rational choice of minimum transaction cost is to adopt the public security service supply mode which is mainly provided by the government, and the for-profit security enterprises, community organizations and individuals are the main public security service providers which can not be ignored; the government, the market, the government and the market, The main choice of voluntary supply and its function boundary are relative and dynamic, and there is no fixed reasonable boundary.
【作者单位】：山东大学经济学院;山东警察学院;
【分类号】：D631.4

【参考文献】