国际班轮运输公司强制缔约义务否定论——一个案例引发的思考

发布时间：2018-01-17 13:34

本文关键词：国际班轮运输公司强制缔约义务否定论——一个案例引发的思考　出处：《中国海商法研究》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在"马士基公司、厦门外代与瀛海公司国际海上货运代理经营权损害赔偿纠纷案"中,各级法院对于国际班轮运输公司是否应负担强制缔约义务有所分歧。对此,根据适用强制缔约的"递进式适用标准",并在此基础上通过对我国法制环境的分析、参考滥用市场支配地位的认定因素、基于对货方利益的保护,得出否定国际班轮运输公司强制缔约义务的结论,并进一步分析了此结论对于契约法中准确定位强制缔约制度的理论意义,以及保障我国国际班轮运输市场竞争环境良性发展的实践意义。
[Abstract]:In the "Maersk Line, Xiamen and Ying Hai Company outside the company's international maritime freight forwarder operating rights of damages dispute case". Courts at all levels are divided as to whether international liner shipping companies should bear the obligation of compulsory contracting. In this regard, according to the application of the "progressive application standard" of compulsory contracting. And on this basis through the analysis of the legal environment of our country, referring to the identified factors of abuse of market dominant position, based on the protection of the interests of the cargo side, the conclusion of denying the compulsory contracting obligations of international liner shipping companies is drawn. Furthermore, it analyzes the theoretical significance of this conclusion for the accurate positioning of the compulsory contracting system in the contract law and the practical significance of ensuring the healthy development of the competitive environment in the international liner transportation market in China.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.294;D923.6;D922.294
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出马士基(中国)航运有限公司(简称马士基公司)常年经营厦门国际集装箱班轮运输业务,中国厦门外轮代理有限公司(简称厦门外代)为其代理人。2005年3月3日前,厦门瀛海实业发展有限公司(简称瀛海公司)均能从厦门外代处正常提取马士基公司的集装箱,从事进出口集装箱拖

【相似文献】