美国网络产业反垄断法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 08:13

本文关键词：美国网络产业反垄断法律问题研究　出处：《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：网络在给人们的生活创造巨大便利的同时,也带来了一系列的问题,网络产业垄断问题伴随21世纪后计算机的普及而产生,是个较新命题。网络产业的垄断具有常态性、不稳定性、“新效果”等特点,传统的反不正当竞争法或反垄断法难以完全适用。随着网络产业的日益壮大和发展,网络产业垄断问题日益凸显。我国反垄断法律原则性规定较多,可操作性不强,应对网络产业反垄断问题实践经验不足。而美国作为市场经济高度发达的国家之一,不仅是第一部反垄断法的诞生之地,而且是网络经济的发源地,有着完备的反垄断法律制度,丰富的判例实践。近年来,美国网络领域发生了几起影响深远的反垄断案件,并通过实践中的不断摸索,对传统理论进行了相应革新,对传统方法进行了相应修正。这些理论和经验接受了实践的检验,具有较强现实意义,值得我国学习、借鉴。本文主要由美国网络产业反垄断法律问题研究和对我国的启示构成,首先简单介绍了网络产业反垄断的一般理论性问题,然后分章论述了美国处理网络产业相关市场的界定、滥用市场支配地位的规制方法和反垄断法律责任制度三个基本法律问题的经验和方法,最后一章结合我国政治体制框架和经济发展现状,阐述了美国的相关经验对我国的指导意义。文章全面对比分析了网络产业与传统产业反垄断的不同之处,深入反思了我国在网络产业反垄断案件处理方法上屡遭诟病的原因,认为我国对待违反反垄断法企业的态度虽然符合当前保护自由竞争和技术创新的国家政策,但如果对网络产业垄断行为一味姑息,将遭遇得不偿失的损失。因此应当全方位学习美国的先进理论和实践经验,在界定网络产业相关市场时考虑双边市场因素、更加注重消费者和产品性能的影响,准确界定网络产业相关市场。在认定一个网络企业是否有滥用市场支配地位行为时采用行为主义的判断标准,并对违反反垄断法的网络产业采取开放平台的制裁方式,不仅避免伤及有效益的合法垄断行为,而且使真正有碍市场秩序的垄断行为得到法律应有规制。
[Abstract]:The network not only creates great convenience for people's life, but also brings a series of problems. The monopoly of network industry comes into being with the popularization of computer after 21th century. It is a relatively new proposition. The monopoly of network industry has the characteristics of normality, instability, "new effect" and so on. The traditional anti-unfair competition law or anti-monopoly law is difficult to fully apply. With the growing and development of the network industry, the network industry monopoly issues become increasingly prominent. The United States, as one of the highly developed countries in the market economy, is not only the birthplace of the first anti-monopoly law. And is the birthplace of the network economy, with a complete antitrust legal system, rich practice of jurisprudence. In recent years, there have been several far-reaching antitrust cases in the field of network in the United States. Through the continuous exploration in practice, the traditional theory has been innovated and the traditional method has been revised accordingly. These theories and experiences have been tested by practice and have strong practical significance and are worthy of our country to learn. This paper mainly consists of the research on the anti-monopoly law of the network industry in the United States and the enlightenment to our country. Firstly, it introduces the general theory of anti-monopoly in the network industry. Then it discusses the three basic legal problems in the United States, such as the definition of the network industry related market, the regulation method of abusing the dominant position of the market and the anti-monopoly legal liability system. The last chapter combined with the political system framework and the current economic development of our country, elaborated the relevant experience of the United States to China's guiding significance. The article compared and analyzed the network industry and traditional industry anti-monopoly differences. This paper deeply reflects on the reasons why our country has repeatedly criticized the methods of dealing with network industry antitrust cases, and thinks that the attitude of our country towards enterprises violating the anti-monopoly law is in line with the current national policy of protecting free competition and technological innovation. However, if we indulge the monopoly behavior of the network industry, we will encounter losses that outweigh the gains and losses. Therefore, we should study the advanced theory and practical experience of the United States in all aspects. In defining the network industry-related markets, consider the bilateral market factors, pay more attention to the impact of consumers and product performance. Define the relevant market of network industry accurately. Use behaviorism judgment standard when determining whether a network enterprise has abused market dominant position behavior. And to take the open platform sanction to the network industry which violates the anti-monopoly law, not only to avoid the harm to the legal monopoly behavior, but also to make the monopoly behavior which really hinders the market order to be regulated by the law.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29

【参考文献】