《唐律》中的身份犯研究
发布时间:2018-01-29 04:44
本文关键词: 唐律 身份犯 宗法伦理 出处:《郑州大学》2009年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:唐代是我国古代法律发展的繁荣时期,《唐律》作为中国古代法的鼎盛之作,其有关身份犯的立法也达到了相当成熟的地步。《唐律》中的身份犯是在继承前代身份犯的立法成果的基础之上,充分考量了身份关系所带来的权利义务以及犯罪时所应承担的责任后,确立了关于身份犯罪的具体的惩处规定。本文以《唐律疏议》为基础来研究其中的身份犯问题的原貌与特点,将散乱地分布在全文各处的具体法律条文列举出来并通过阐述进而进行特征性分析。 本文共分三个部分,首先全面分析了《唐律》律文中有关身份犯的具体立法规定,并将众多的法律条文分为数个类型。从类型上可以看出,唐律身份犯在继承吸收前代立法成果的同时又加以创新,使唐代的身份立法更为复杂、完善。其次,通过具体的分类叙述,结合唐代的立法思想,本文认为唐律身份犯具有四个特点,即突出整饬吏治、宗法伦理性强、多重身份重合和犯罪主体的身份扩大化。最后,从本文的论述中可以看出,唐律的身份犯规定并非如以往所认为的完全是不平等的、特权性的、差异性的法,其中仍有合乎情势、值得借鉴的合理之处。同时《唐律》植根于传统法律文化的身份犯规定,对于当今立法实践中身份犯问题也有借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:The Tang Dynasty was a prosperous period for the development of ancient law in China. The legislation on status crime has also reached a very mature stage. The status crime in the Tang Law is based on the legislative achievements of the previous generation of identity crime. Full consideration is given to the rights and obligations arising from the identity relationship as well as to the responsibilities to be assumed in the event of the commission of the crime. This paper studies the original appearance and characteristics of the status crime based on Tang Law. This paper enumerates the specific legal provisions scattered around the text and analyzes the characteristics by expounding them. This article is divided into three parts, first of all, the comprehensive analysis of the specific legislative provisions of the law of the Tang Dynasty, and a large number of legal provisions can be divided into several types, from the type can be seen. While inheriting and absorbing the legislative achievements of the previous generation, the status crime of Tang Dynasty is innovated, which makes the status legislation of the Tang Dynasty more complex and perfect. Secondly, it combines the legislative thoughts of the Tang Dynasty with the specific classification narration. This paper holds that the status crime of Tang Dynasty has four characteristics, that is, highlighting the rectification of official administration, strong patriarchal ethics, multiple identity overlap and the expansion of the identity of the criminal subject. Finally, we can see from the discussion of this article. The stipulation of the status crime of Tang Law is not completely unequal, privileged and different as previously thought, and there are still some laws in accordance with the situation. At the same time, "Tang Law" rooted in the traditional legal culture of the status of crime provisions, for today's legislative practice of identity crime also has reference significance.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D929;D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 邵维国;浅谈先秦时期身份犯问题[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2000年02期
2 郑彦操,朱劲雄;刑法上身份概念的辩析[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2003年02期
3 刘绍云;儒家伦理思想对中国传统法律的影响[J];理论学刊;2003年06期
4 康均心;略论刑法中身份的两个问题[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年02期
5 高绍先;《唐律疏说》与中国古代法文化[J];现代法学;1997年02期
,本文编号:1472562
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1472562.html