担保债权的经济优势及担保利益之确定——以英国普通法为视角

发布时间：2018-02-02 21:05

本文关键词： 担保债权经济优势合同自由未来财产　出处：《江淮论坛》2012年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通常而言,在债务人违约时,担保债权人比无担保债权人拥有更多的选择权。英国法律以其灵活性、以及接受并赋予创新性结构以法律效力的能力,提供了既满足消费者又满足资本提供者需求的担保机制,从而在商业发展中发挥着重要作用。驱动着法律发展演变的是实践人士而不是立法机构,并在面临不确定性时由法院来决定其法律效力。"担保利益"的范围,面临一定的不确定性。在法律含义上,授权与保留存在根本的区别。担保财产包括抵押人在未来可以获得的财产,但该未来财产的类型应存在限制。
[Abstract]:Typically, in the case of a debtor's default, the secured creditor has more options than the unsecured creditor. English law, with its flexibility, as well as the ability to accept and give legal effect to innovative structures. Providing a guarantee mechanism that meets both consumer and capital provider needs and thus plays an important role in business development, it is practitioners rather than legislatures that drive the evolution of the law. And in the face of uncertainty, the court will decide its legal effect. The scope of "security interest" is faced with certain uncertainty. There is a fundamental difference between authorization and retention. Secured property includes property that the mortgagor may acquire in the future, provided that the type of future property is limited.
【作者单位】：英国剑桥大学法学院;剑桥大学法学院公司法与商法研究中心;华东政法大学国际金融法律学院;
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913
【正文快照】： 一、担保债权人的优势及其经济分析“担保”这一术语意味着一种财产权利,也就是说,拥有与某一事物有关的请求权。[1]保证不是此一定义上的担保,因为债权人只对保证人拥有特定的请求权。[2]如果公司资不抵债,通常而言,它的担保债权人的地位优于无担保债权人。在破产时,无担保

【相似文献】