徜徉在求真与求实之间——评马作武教授《先秦法律思想史》

发布时间：2018-03-03 22:01

本文选题：法律思想史　切入点：学术概念　出处：《法学评论》2015年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正中国但凡国史论的著作,都有求真抑或求实的考量。这是因为经史子集的学术传统,对古代史或叙或论时,叙说的框架早已固化为上溯先贤圣言或者谋划经世致用;而其近代一旦改为文史社哲,则分科的学术概念令人踟蹰,不能对应古代史。"天命"的正当性何如,"势"、"术"的结构性何在,"德"、"礼"中何者系属于法?这基本都是中国法思想史不能回应的问题。由是,在法思想史的著作中有一种致思方法,是在传统的叙说体系中,运用传统的术语来进行法思想解读。这种论证不妨称为"求实"。例如杨鹤皋先生著《中国法律思想通
[Abstract]:All the works of Chinese Dante's historical theory have the consideration of seeking truth or seeking truth. This is because of the academic tradition of a subset of history, the framework of narration has already been solidified into the sages of the past or the planning and application of the world; But once its modern times is changed to literature and history society philosophy, then the academic concept of division subject makes people hesitate, cannot correspond to ancient history. The legitimacy of "fate" He Ru, "power", "skill" structure, "virtue", "ritual" which belongs to the law? This is basically a question that cannot be answered in the history of Chinese legal thought. Therefore, there is a method of thinking in the works of the history of legal thought, which is in the traditional narrative system. This argument can be called "seeking truth". For example, Mr. Yang Hegao wrote "General understanding of Chinese legal thought".
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D909.2

【相似文献】