欧共体竞争法中的国家援助控制制度研究
发布时间:2018-05-20 23:13
本文选题:欧共体竞争法 + 国家援助 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 欧共体国家援助控制制度是欧共体竞争法极为重要的组成部分,对欧共体共同市场的形成起着不可或缺的作用。国家援助控制制度的本质在于将作为产业政策的国家援助统一纳入竞争法的调整范畴,这既表明了一种价值观,也体现了一种路径的选择,即共同体目标必须以竞争秩序的维护为基础,并最终通过由公平竞争所激发的市场内部活力得以实现。而这样一种观念和制度正是处于经济体制转型过程中的中国值得借鉴的。到目前为止,国内并没有专门论述欧共体国家援助控制制度的著作,偶有个别文章也只是对其进行了粗略的介绍。而本文以大量欧洲委员会文本以及欧洲法院判例为基础,不仅从理论上,更是从实践上对欧共体竞争法中的国家援助控制制度的进行了全面阐述,意在更加深刻的揭示这一制度的意义、精髓以及值得反思之处。 本文由五个部分组成: 第一部分对欧共体竞争法中的国家援助控制制度相关基本理论进行了概括总结。首先,从国家援助控制制度的理论基础入手,阐述了欧共体在产业政策与竞争政策发生冲突时所坚持的竞争政策优先的立场,进一步揭示了国家援助控制制度的价值目标在于对竞争秩序的维护以及共同体目标的实现。然后,在此基础上具体阐述了欧共体国家援助控制制度的产生背景及发展历程。 第二部分结合欧共体条约规则以及欧洲委员会、欧洲法院的实践,对国家援助的内涵进行了界定,具体从四个方面进行了详细论述:一、任何形式的援助;二、由国家或者通过国家资源给予;三、扭曲竞争或者造成竞争威胁——选择性;四、影响成员国之间的贸易。 第三部分进一步对国家援助豁免进行了分类与总结。根据豁免强度及豁免条件的不同,将国家援助豁免具体分为以下五个层次:绝对豁免、相对豁免、特许豁免、集体豁免以及微量豁免。 第四部分集中于阐述国家援助控制程序。通过对程序条例以及大量具体案例的分析,揭示了在整个国家援助控制体系中,欧洲委员会、欧洲法院以及各成员国法院分别发挥的程序性作用。 第五部分全面论述了国家援助救济措施——援助恢复。这一措施在实现对非法援助的补救上具有十分重要的意义,但援助恢复在实践中却存在诸多问题。因此,本部分通过对援助恢复的价值目标、规则演进、限制、实施以及违反恢复性决议的后果共五个部分的全面阐述,明晰了该救济措施作为国家援助控制制度重要组成部分的本质要求。
[Abstract]:The national aid control system of EC is an important part of EC competition law and plays an indispensable role in the formation of EC Common Market. The essence of the state aid control system lies in the unification of state aid as industrial policy into the adjustment of competition law, which shows both a value and a path choice. That is, the goal of community must be based on the maintenance of competitive order, and finally be realized through the internal vitality of the market stimulated by fair competition. Such a concept and system is in the process of economic transformation of China is worth learning. Up to now, there are no books on the national aid control system in the European Community. Based on a large number of texts of the European Commission and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, not only in theory, but also in practice, the state aid control system in the competition law of the European Community is comprehensively expounded in this paper. It is intended to reveal the meaning, essence and rethinking of this system. This paper consists of five parts: The first part summarizes the basic theories of state aid control system in EC competition law. First of all, starting from the theoretical basis of the state aid control system, this paper expounds the EC's position on competition policy priority when industrial policy and competition policy conflict. It further reveals that the value goal of the state aid control system lies in the maintenance of the competition order and the realization of the community goal. Then, on the basis of this, the background and development process of EEC's national aid control system are elaborated. The second part defines the meaning of state aid in the light of the EC treaty rules and the practice of the European Commission and the European Court of Justice, and discusses in detail the following four aspects: first, any form of assistance; second, Given by or through national resources; third, distorting competition or creating competitive threats-selectivity; fourth, affecting trade among member countries. The third part further classifies and summarizes the state aid exemption. According to the different immunity intensity and exemption conditions, the state aid exemption is divided into the following five levels: absolute immunity, relative immunity, franchise exemption, collective immunity and micro exemption. The fourth part focuses on the state aid control procedures. Through the analysis of procedural regulations and a large number of specific cases, this paper reveals the procedural roles played by the European Commission, the European Court of Justice and the courts of member States in the whole state aid control system. The fifth part comprehensively discusses the national aid relief measures-aid recovery. This measure is of great significance in realizing the remedy of illegal aid, but there are many problems in the practice of aid recovery. Therefore, the present part provides a comprehensive description of the value objectives of aid recovery, the evolution of rules, limitations, implementation and the consequences of violating restorative resolutions. The essential requirements of the relief measures as an important part of the state aid control system are clarified.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D95
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈玉皎;WTO补贴规则与欧盟国家援助规则之比较[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:1916654
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1916654.html