英联邦国家的调解制度对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-05-27 04:13

本文选题：调解 + 强制调解　；参考：《上海交通大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 在当代,随着社会主体在价值观和文化传统及利益冲突上的多元化,多元化纠纷解决机制的建立已经成为一个世界性的课题。各国通常把法院以外的各种非诉讼纠纷解决方式统称为替代性纠纷解决方式(ADR)。调解作为ADR的一种主要形式,与审判一起构成中国的两种主要纠纷解决机制。然而近年来,随着市场经济的活跃与发展,调解制度也暴露出诸多弊端。而西方国家如英国、加拿大、澳大利亚的调解制度发展比较成熟,对于我国有极其重要的借鉴意义。结合我国的法律文化传统和调解发展趋势,科学的吸收其他国家调解制度的合理因素,并在此基础上形成具有中国特色的调解制度。全文共分为三章: 第一章简述英联邦国家中的英国、加拿大和澳大利亚这三国的调解制度。第二章从三个方面对这三个国家的调解制度进行比较。第三章对我国调解制度的发展历史作了简要的概述,以及当今存在的问题,着重阐述了英联邦国家调解制度对我国的启示。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the diversity of social subjects in values, cultural traditions and conflicts of interest, the establishment of pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism has become a worldwide issue. Countries usually refer to all kinds of non-litigation dispute settlement outside the court as alternative dispute resolution. Mediation, as a main form of ADR, together with trial, constitutes two major dispute resolution mechanisms in China. However, in recent years, with the active and development of market economy, mediation system also exposed many drawbacks. Western countries, such as Britain, Canada, Australia, the development of mediation system is relatively mature, for our country has an extremely important reference. Combined with the tradition of legal culture and the development trend of mediation in our country, the reasonable factors of mediation system in other countries are absorbed scientifically, and on this basis, the mediation system with Chinese characteristics is formed. The full text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter briefly describes the British, Canadian and Australian mediation systems in the Commonwealth countries. Chapter two compares the mediation system of these three countries from three aspects. The third chapter gives a brief overview of the history of China's mediation system, as well as the existing problems, focusing on the Commonwealth countries mediation system for China's inspiration.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D956.1;D915.1

【参考文献】