德国刑事诉讼中协商制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 03:27

本文选题：协商制度 + 判决协商　；参考：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： ?德国于上世纪70年代在刑事诉讼中引入了协商制度,但该制度在很长一段时间内都仅仅以非正式的形式存在。近年来,德国立法者试图通过立法来加强对非正式协商制度的规制,使协商制度有明确的法律依据可循。最终于2009年8月正式通过了关于协商制度的刑事诉讼法修正案。本文从德国协商制度发展过程中出现的问题出发,结合德国联邦最高法院的相关判例及联邦议院关于刑事诉讼法的最新的立法修正案,来阐释协商制度在德国刑事诉讼中的运作模式及相关程序性规定,并从功能比较的视角出发,比较了德国的协商制度与美国的辩诉交易,以期为我国的刑事诉讼程序的改革提供借鉴。本文共分为以下几个部分: 第一部分简要介绍协商制度在德国的发展历程并对协商制度概念进行限定,将其限定在判决协商,而不包括起诉协商。第二部分详细阐述协商制度在德国的源起和发展,重点分析源起和发展背后的社会成因以及协商制度中各方当事人的利益要求。第三部分为本文的重点部分,结合德国刑事诉讼法修正案及相关判例和法典评论来分析协商制度的立法规制和具体的规定。第四部分主要论述协商制度在德国的一些理论争议,包括对刑事司法原则的冲击和在协商实践中可能出现的争论点,并对协商制度在德国的未来趋势作出展望。第五部分将德国的协商制度与美国的辩诉交易以比较法上之功能比较的视角作出对比。第六部分论及协商制度与我国刑事司法中的形势政策和刑事司法的关系。第七部分结合德国刑事诉讼中协商制度的立法经验来论述其对我国刑事司法的借鉴意义,重点阐述了协商制度与我国现行的相关制度对接的可能性。最后得出本文结论。
[Abstract]:? Germany introduced the system of consultation in criminal proceedings in the 1970s, but the system existed only in informal form for a long time. In recent years, German legislators try to strengthen the regulation of informal consultation system through legislation, so that the consultation system has a clear legal basis. Finally, in August 2009, the formal adoption of the consultation system of the Criminal procedure Law amendments. Starting from the problems in the development of the German consultation system, this paper combines the relevant jurisprudence of the German Federal Supreme Court and the latest legislative amendments of the Bundestag on the criminal procedure law. To explain the operating mode and related procedural provisions of the negotiation system in German criminal proceedings, and to compare the German negotiation system with the plea bargaining system of the United States from the perspective of functional comparison. In order to provide reference for the reform of criminal procedure in our country. This paper is divided into the following parts: The first part briefly introduces the development of negotiation system in Germany and limits the concept of negotiation system, which is limited to judgment negotiation, not prosecution negotiation. The second part elaborates the origin and development of the consultation system in Germany, focusing on the social causes behind the origin and development of the consultation system and the interests of the parties involved in the consultation system. The third part is the key part of this paper, combined with the amendment of German Criminal procedure Law and relevant jurisprudence and code comments to analyze the legislative regulations and specific provisions of the consultation system. The fourth part mainly discusses some theoretical disputes of the consultation system in Germany, including the impact on the criminal justice principle and the possible issues in the negotiation practice, and the prospect of the future trend of the consultation system in Germany. In the fifth part, the author compares German negotiation system with American plea bargaining from the perspective of functional comparison in comparative law. The sixth part deals with the relationship between the consultation system and the situation, policy and criminal justice in China's criminal justice. In the seventh part, the author discusses the significance of the consultation system in the criminal procedure of Germany, focusing on the possibility of the connection between the consultation system and the related system in our country. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is drawn.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D951.6;DD915.3

【引证文献】