论“双反调查”对中美贸易的影响以及国际公平竞争秩序的维护

发布时间：2018-06-20 01:28

本文选题：反倾销 + 反补贴　；参考：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来美国频繁对华实施反倾销反补贴合并调查。在论证其非法性和对国际公平竞争秩序破坏的同时,试图以此为契机,引导我国政府和企业寻找应对双反调查、维护自身权益的策略,进而完善我国维护国际公平竞争秩序的相关法制建设。通过对WTO相关法规的解读,领会国际立法维护公平竞争秩序的主旨。我国正遵从这一立法精神,不断完善相关法律制度建设,在维护国内企业的合法权益和恢复良好的国际竞争秩序上,发挥日趋重要的作用。文章主要分为以下几个部分: 第一章通过概括列举美对华双反调查的案例、结合相关法律条文的引用和法理分析,论证了实施双反调查的非法性。双反调查超出了其对国内产业受到的实质性损害补偿的限度,对我国的出口贸易造成了损害。双反调查是对国际公平竞争秩序的违反。第二章通过简要引用经济学理论结合相关法律规定的分析,说明双重计税的方法和“非市场经济国家”地位的认定,是我国对美贸易中遭受不公平对待的基础。第三章以《SCM协议》和GATS为例,通过解读其中关于竞争秩序的相关条款,了解到国际社会如何通过立法维护公平的国际竞争环境。揭示了WTO相关法律维护国际公平竞争秩序的立法精神,提出我国立法上的欠缺及完善竞争立法的必要。第四章简要介绍美国立法保护本国利益的做法,对比说明了我国是如何维护公平的国际竞争秩序的。文章从政府、企业行会和企业本身的角度出发,分别论述应当如何维护竞争秩序。结合我国的实际情况,大量引用数据和事实,着重阐述我国应如何从竞争法制综合建设的角度完善立法,力争使法律与政策、制度相互协调,建立公平的国际竞争秩序。结语:总结前文,提出新的国际形势下对我国对外贸易的展望。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the United States has frequently carried out anti-dumping and anti-subsidy merger investigations against China. While demonstrating its illegality and destroying the international fair competition order, this paper tries to take this opportunity to guide our government and enterprises to find strategies to deal with the double counter investigation and safeguard their own rights and interests. Then perfect our country to maintain the international fair competition order related legal system construction. Through the interpretation of WTO laws and regulations, we can understand the purport of international legislation to maintain fair competition order. Our country is complying with this legislative spirit, perfecting the construction of relevant legal system, and playing an increasingly important role in safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of domestic enterprises and restoring a good international competition order. The article is mainly divided into the following parts: the first chapter demonstrates the illegality of carrying out double counter investigation by summarizing and enumerating the cases of American double counter investigation in China, combining with the citation and legal theory analysis of relevant legal provisions. The double-counter investigation exceeds the limit of compensation for the material damage to the domestic industry and damages the export trade of our country. The double-counter investigation is a violation of the international fair competition order. In the second chapter, by briefly quoting the economic theory and analyzing the relevant laws and regulations, the author explains that the method of double taxation and the recognition of the status of "non-market economy country" are the basis of unfair treatment in China's trade with the United States. The third chapter takes SCM and GATS as an example to understand how the international community maintains a fair international competition environment through legislation. This paper reveals the legislative spirit of WTO related laws to maintain the international fair competition order, and points out the lack of legislation in our country and the necessity of perfecting the competition legislation. The fourth chapter briefly introduces American legislation to protect its own interests, and compares how China maintains a fair international competition order. This paper discusses how to maintain the competition order from the angle of government, enterprise guild and enterprise itself. According to the actual situation of our country, citing a large number of data and facts, this paper emphatically expounds how our country should perfect the legislation from the angle of comprehensive construction of competition legal system, strive to make the law, policy and system coordinate with each other, and establish a fair international competition order. Conclusion: summing up the previous article and putting forward the prospect of China's foreign trade under the new international situation.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D996.1;D922.295;D971.2

【参考文献】