民事庭审语篇中的目标实现—评价理论视角

发布时间：2018-06-20 04:07

本文选题：介入 + 真实性　；参考：《广东外语外贸大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本论文旨在根据J.R.Martin和P.R.R.White的评价理论来研究民事法庭审判语篇中使用的最主要的评价资源以及这些主要的评价资源在民事法庭审判中是怎样运用的。之后,该论文根据Jef Verschueren的顺应理论来研究为什么民事法庭审判中的各方要在法庭审判中使用这些主要的评价资源。该论文的研究目标就是要找出庭审中的各参与方使用评价资源的潜在规律。首先,本论文以从中法网上选取的十个民事庭审语篇为语料并且通过使用描述法和说明的方法来描述在民事法庭语篇中使用的评价资源,即民事法庭审判语篇中都使用了态度资源、介入资源和级差资源。随后该论文从统计中得出结论:介入资源是民事法庭语篇中最经常使用的资源。众所周知,法庭审判重视证据。与此同时,法官和人民陪审员也高度关注证据。在民事法庭审判中,原被告双方为了实现各自的目的以及维护自己的权利和利益,原被告中的一方总是竭尽全力的证明对方的证据是虚假的、无关的以及是非法的,以此来说服法官和人民陪审员。由此可见,证据的可信度在民事法庭审判中是十分重要的,因此,本文的第二个研究问题就是法庭审判的各方是如何通过主要评价资源的应用来更好的说明己方证据的可信度以及对方证据的不可信的,即庭审中的各方是怎样通过使用主要的评价资源来达到证明(驳倒)己方(对方)证据的可信度的。对于第三个研究问题,该论文使用Jef Verschueren's的顺应理论,特别是三个世界(物理世界、心理世界以及社交世界)的理论来解释为什么要使用这些主要的评价资源。该论文的意义在于通过对十个民事法庭审判语篇的研究来给从语言学的角度研究法庭审判提供一定的思考,扩大评价理论应用的范围以及给法律界的学者们一些启发。
[Abstract]:Based on the evaluation theory of J. R. Martin and P.R.R. White, this thesis aims to study the most important evaluation resources used in civil court discourse and how these main evaluation resources are used in civil court trials. Then, according to Jef Verschueren's adaptation theory, this paper studies why the parties in the civil court trial should use these main evaluation resources in the court trial. The purpose of this paper is to find out the potential rules of using evaluation resources by participants in the trial. First of all, this thesis uses ten civil trial texts selected from the Chinese legal Network as the corpus and describes the evaluation resources used in civil court discourse by using descriptive and explanatory methods. In other words, the civil court trial discourse uses attitude resources, intervention resources and differential resources. Then the paper draws a conclusion from statistics that intervention resources are the most frequently used resources in civil court discourse. It is well known that court trials attach importance to evidence. At the same time, judges and people's jurors are also highly concerned about evidence. In civil court trials, in order to achieve their respective purposes and safeguard their rights and interests, one of the original defendants always does their utmost to prove that the other party's evidence is false, irrelevant and illegal. In order to persuade the judge and the people's jury. It can be seen that the credibility of the evidence is very important in civil court trials. The second research question in this paper is how the parties to the court trial can use the main evaluation resources to better explain the credibility of their own evidence and the credibility of the other party's evidence. That is, how the parties in the trial use the main evaluation resources to prove (refute) their own evidence. For the third question, this paper uses the adaptation theory of Jef Verschuerens, especially the theory of three worlds (physical world, psychological world and social world) to explain why these main evaluation resources should be used. The significance of this thesis is to provide some thoughts for the study of court trial from the perspective of linguistics, to expand the scope of application of the evaluation theory and to enlighten the scholars in the legal profession through the study of the discourse of ten civil court trials.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D90-055;H030

【参考文献】