古中国与古罗马借贷纠纷救济途径的比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-29 12:13

本文选题：公力救济 + 私力救济　；参考：《河北法学》2013年11期

【摘要】：为了保障借贷双方当事人的权益,古中国与古罗马都曾努力寻找解决借贷纠纷的途径。首先通过公力救济的方式来规制借贷行为,其次,国民也以私力救济的方式来解决借贷纠纷。在东西方不同的法文化背景之下,古中国与古罗马借贷纠纷的救济途径存在很大差异。为了优化我国目前借贷纠纷救济途径,更好地解决借贷纠纷,应从根源上探究两国借贷纠纷救济途径产生差异的历史根源及法文化内涵,以探寻适合我国的借贷纠纷救济途径。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the rights and interests of both parties, both ancient China and Rome tried to find a way to solve the loan dispute. Firstly, the borrowing behavior is regulated by means of public relief, and secondly, private relief is used to solve the loan disputes. Under the different backgrounds of law and culture between East and West, there are great differences between ancient China and ancient Rome in the ways of relief of loan disputes. In order to optimize the ways of relief of loan disputes in our country and solve them better, we should explore the historical origin and the connotation of law and culture of the differences between the two countries' ways of relief of loan disputes from the root of the sources, in order to explore the ways of relief of loan disputes suitable for our country.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：2012年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目《权利本位研究范式与当代中国法学的发展》(12YJC820079) 辽宁省教育厅哲学社会科学重大基础理论研究课题《文化繁荣与文化创造语境下的中国法文化研究》的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D904.1;D929;D923

【参考文献】