私法规范文本解释之价值判断

发布时间：2018-10-26 19:29

【摘要】：法律解释是解释主体基于价值判断选择解释对象和运用解释方法的结果。法律解释之价值判断围绕具体的案件事实以及与具体的案件事实直接相关的法律文本展开。在私法领域,对事实文本予以解释并赋予其法律上的意义,要比解释相应的私法规范的法律文本更有价值。因为价值判断的主观认识,法律解释的结论总是相对的。文义解释是法律解释的起点,在一系列的法律解释方法中居于绝对优先地位,尊重法律文本的文义,自身就是价值判断的产物。法律文本未经由文义解释,就不能作论理解释。论理解释对于澄清因为文义解释而产生的歧义具有意义,但其并不单纯为消除文义解释的"歧义"而被利用。论理解释的诸方法究竟应当在什么场合使用,并不取决于该方法的使用有无先后位序,而取决于法律文本解释者的价值判断,论理解释方法对于调节法律文本解释的文义偏差的作用也是相对的。
[Abstract]:Legal interpretation is the result of the subject's choice of interpretation object based on value judgment and the application of interpretation method. The value judgment of legal interpretation revolves around the specific facts of the case and the legal texts directly related to the specific facts of the case. In the field of private law, it is more valuable to interpret the factual text and endow it with legal significance than the legal text which interprets the corresponding norms of private law. Because of the subjective understanding of value judgment, the conclusion of legal interpretation is always relative. The interpretation of literary meaning is the starting point of legal interpretation. In a series of legal interpretation methods, it is the product of value judgment to respect the meaning of legal text. A legal text cannot be interpreted without meaning. Argumentative interpretation is of significance for clarifying the ambiguity arising from the interpretation of literary meaning, but it is not used solely to eliminate the "ambiguity" of the interpretation of literary meaning. The situation in which the methods of rational interpretation should be used does not depend on the order in which the methods are used, but on the value judgment of the interpreters of the legal texts. The method of argumentative interpretation is also relative to the adjustment of the deviation of meaning in the interpretation of legal texts.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】