民法解释视野下能动司法问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-13 04:06

本文关键词：民法解释视野下能动司法问题研究　出处：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来，能动司法已成为法学界的一个研究热点。传统的能动司法是指司法权主动积极地利用一切资源，运用司法手段追求法律、政治、社会效果三者之间的统一，以回应社会变迁和民众需求的司法审判方式。从方法论上讨论的能动司法是指法官在审判案件过程中运用法律解释来对案件进行裁判，以实现法律形式合法性和实质合理性的统一。而目前对方法论意义上的能动司法研究较少，因此研究能动司法的适用确有必要，尤其是在民事案件中。通过对法官在司法实践中的能动司法典型案例进行归类与剖析，发现案例中法官运用解释推导结论的正向裁判思维过程只是虚饰的表象。实际上，法官裁判案件是依据结论决定解释的逆向裁判思维。通过这些思维过程可知，在我国法官司法裁判过程并非是简单地运用逻辑三段论，而是通过法律解释的回溯推理，并根据法律后果的好坏来进一步修正自己初步结论的过程。理性地看待这种意义上的能动司法必须认识到，一方面它会产生诸多正面效应：弥补立法不足，化解基层的社会矛盾，做到提高司法效率与实现实质公正并举等；但另一方面也会带来一些负面效应：造成法官自由裁量权的膨胀和法院工作机制创新中的错误等。当前我国的能动司法缺乏应有规制，而法律方法恰好能从有效性和正当性两方面对司法活动予以必要的控制，因此在民法解释视野下能动司法的正确适用应当坚持方法上的克制与功能上的能动相统一。通过坚持正确的司法理念，恰当地选择解释方法，来规范法律解释；运用严谨的逻辑推理和正当性的法律论证，，来强调法官说理；明确能动司法的法律界限和职权界限，以规范法院管理制度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, active justice has become a research hotspot in the field of law. Traditional active justice refers to the active use of all resources by judicial power and the pursuit of law and politics by judicial means. The unity of three social effects. In order to respond to the changes of society and the needs of the public, the active justice discussed from the methodology refers to the judge using legal interpretation to judge the case in the course of trial. In order to realize the unity of legal form legitimacy and substantive rationality, however, there is little research on active judicial research in the methodological sense at present, so it is necessary to study the application of active justice. Especially in civil cases. Through the judge in the judicial practice of active judicial typical case classification and analysis. It is found that the positive thinking process of the judge using the interpretation to deduce the conclusion in the case is only a false appearance. In fact, the judge adjudication case is the reverse judgment thinking which decides the interpretation according to the conclusion. Through these thinking processes, we can know. In our country, the judicial judgment process of judges is not a simple use of logic syllogism, but through the retrospective reasoning of legal interpretation. And according to the quality of the legal consequences to further revise their preliminary conclusions. Rational view of this sense of active justice must recognize that on the one hand it will have a lot of positive effects: to make up for the lack of legislation. To resolve the social contradictions at the grass-roots level, to improve judicial efficiency and achieve substantive justice and so on; But on the other hand, it will bring some negative effects, such as the expansion of judges' discretion and the mistakes in the innovation of the working mechanism of the court, etc. At present, the active judicature in our country lacks due regulation. However, the legal method can control the judicial activities from the aspects of validity and legitimacy. Therefore, the correct application of active judicature in the field of interpretation of civil law should adhere to the unity of restraint in method and initiative in function. Using rigorous logical reasoning and legitimate legal argumentation to emphasize the reasoning of judges; Make clear the legal limit and authority limit of the active judicature, in order to standardize the court management system.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】