滥用司法鉴定问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 19:05

本文关键词： 司法鉴定滥用司法鉴定专家辅助人制度　出处：《扬州大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：尽管人们对司法鉴定的概念持有不同的观点,但是,司法鉴定制度所具备的独特的制度价值在现代社会得到了极大的认可和重视,司法鉴定的价值合理性毋庸置疑,司法鉴定在诉讼活动中为实现人类的正义价值和效率价值做出了不可磨灭的贡献。然而,正是在其价值合理性的光环下,司法实践中具体到个案却出现了大量滥用司法鉴定的现象,严重浪费了司法资源,影响了司法的公平、公正和效率。这其中有当事人方面的原因、司法鉴定机构和鉴定人方面的原因、司法机关和司法工作人员方面的原因,而更深层次的原因是司法鉴定体制、制度和立法方面的原因。为了解决滥用司法鉴定问题,微观上需要构建和完善一系列具体的制度,如：加强法院内部的鉴定管理和考核机制；严格执行当事人协商确定鉴定机构和鉴定人制度；严格执行鉴定人对鉴定事项施行专业对口制度；建立统一完善的司法鉴定标准;严格实行对鉴定材料给予当事人交换、质证和异议申辩制度；严格实行将鉴定费和出庭费分别列支对鉴定人加以约束制度；完善专家辅助人制度；严格实行司法鉴定期限管理制度；严格实行司法鉴定质量和效率评估制度；严格建立健全补充鉴定和重新鉴定审查标准制度；严格实行鉴定人出庭接受质询鉴定意见受到相关法律责任约束制度等。宏观上更要完善司法鉴定管理制度,既要做好司法鉴定行政管理工作,如：统一司法鉴定行政管理体制、加强对司法鉴定机构、司法鉴定人的行政管理,同时需健全司法鉴定行业管理制度,发挥司法鉴定人协会这一自治性社会团体的职能。总之,解决滥用司法鉴定问题是一个系统工程,既需要设计完善的具体制度,又需要宏观思维的把握,现有的法律框架很难协调解决,统一的《司法鉴定法》的制定将是最终解决方案。
[Abstract]:Although people hold different views on the concept of judicial expertise, the unique institutional value of judicial expertise system has been greatly recognized and valued in modern society, and the value of judicial expertise is undoubtedly reasonable. Judicial expertise has made an indelible contribution to the realization of the value of justice and efficiency of human beings in the litigation activities. However, it is under the halo of rationality of its value that the judicial expertise has made an indelible contribution to the realization of human justice and efficiency. In judicial practice, however, a large number of abuses of judicial expertise appear in specific cases, which seriously waste judicial resources and affect the fairness, fairness and efficiency of the administration of justice. There are reasons for the parties concerned. The reasons for forensic agencies and experts, the reasons for judicial organs and judicial staff, and the deeper reasons for the system, system and legislation of judicial expertise... in order to solve the problem of abuse of judicial expertise, At the micro level, a series of concrete systems should be constructed and perfected, such as strengthening the appraisal management and appraisal mechanism within the court, strictly enforcing the parties' consultation to determine the appraisal institution and expert system; Strictly carry out the expert counterpart system for the appraisal matters; establish a unified and perfect standard for judicial identification; strictly implement the system of exchanging, cross-examining and disagreeing on the appraisal materials; Strictly carry out the system of restricting the appraiser separately from the appraisal fee and the court fee; perfect the expert assistant person system; strictly carry out the management system of the judicial appraisal period; strictly carry out the appraisal system of the quality and efficiency of the judicial expertise; Strictly establish and improve the standard system of supplementary identification and re-appraisal examination; strictly implement the system of experts appearing before the court for questioning and appraisal opinions subject to relevant legal responsibilities; and so on. At the macro level, it is even more necessary to improve the management system of judicial expertise. It is necessary to do a good job in the administrative management of judicial expertise, such as unifying the administrative management system of judicial expertise, strengthening the administration of judicial identification institutions and judicial experts, and improving the system of management of the judicial expertise industry at the same time, In short, to solve the problem of abuse of judicial expertise is a systematic project, which requires the design of perfect concrete system and the grasp of macroscopic thinking. It is difficult to coordinate the existing legal framework, and the formulation of the uniform Forensic expertise Law will be the final solution.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】